2020
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rosacea and its comorbidities: Should be emphasized but should not be overemphasized

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, if the hearing loss is considered a comorbidity of rosacea and rosacea, and for rosacea and comorbidities also should be emphasized but should not be overemphasized. 4 In all, due to some biases and limitations in this study, the current evidence is insufficient to suggest that hearing loss should be considered a comorbidity of rosacea also it should not consider that rosacea patients are likely to have sensorineural hearing loss, although the interesting data presented, further study and analysis is needed in the future.…”
Section: Commentary On "Assessment Of Hearing Loss In Patients With R...mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, if the hearing loss is considered a comorbidity of rosacea and rosacea, and for rosacea and comorbidities also should be emphasized but should not be overemphasized. 4 In all, due to some biases and limitations in this study, the current evidence is insufficient to suggest that hearing loss should be considered a comorbidity of rosacea also it should not consider that rosacea patients are likely to have sensorineural hearing loss, although the interesting data presented, further study and analysis is needed in the future.…”
Section: Commentary On "Assessment Of Hearing Loss In Patients With R...mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although the abnormal results of audiometric measurements in rosacea patients compared with healthy controls, due to the limited the small cohort of few participants and a certain bias in hearing audiometry, thus this may mean that the practical clinical significance of investigating the relationship between hearing loss and rosacea also should be reconsidered; it is not a single factor event and cannot be directly attributed and decisioned. Moreover, if the hearing loss is considered a comorbidity of rosacea and rosacea, and for rosacea and comorbidities also should be emphasized but should not be overemphasized 4 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosacea is a chronic skin disorder characterized by erythema, flushing, telangiectasia, papules and pustules, phymatous changes, and ocular involvement. [1][2][3][4][5] In 2012, a standard classification system for rosacea was developed by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. Four distinct subtypes of rosacea were established: erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, and ocular rosacea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by facial flushing, erythema, telangiectasia, papules, and pustules 1–4 . Phymatous changes, ocular involvement, burning, or stinging are often observed in rosacea patients 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by facial flushing, erythema, telangiectasia, papules, and pustules. [1][2][3][4] Phymatous changes, ocular involvement, burning, or stinging are often observed in rosacea patients. 5,6 It has a prevalence of 1%-22% from different reports, mainly affecting fair skin individuals and middle-aged women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%