2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5968584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational-XOR Rectangle Cryptanalysis on Round-Reduced Simon

Abstract: Recently, Ashur and Liu introduced the Rotational-XOR-difference approach which is a modification of rotational cryptanalysis, for an ARX cipher Speck (Ashur and Liu, 2016). In this paper, we apply the Rotational-XOR-difference (RXD) approach to a non-ARX cipher Simon and evaluate its security. First, we studied how to calculate the probability of an RXD for bitwise AND operation that the round function of Simon is based on unlike Speck is on modular addition. Next, we prove that two RXD trails can be connecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boomerangs from [KJK20] together with the ones presented in [CZX + 23] rely on the notion of rotational-xor cryptanalysis, that we now recall.…”
Section: Results By Koo Jung and Kimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The boomerangs from [KJK20] together with the ones presented in [CZX + 23] rely on the notion of rotational-xor cryptanalysis, that we now recall.…”
Section: Results By Koo Jung and Kimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then construct an SMT model to find boomerang distinguishers on KATAN32 and Simon-32/64. We obtained related-key distinguishers for up to 151 rounds of KATAN32 and 17 rounds of Simon-32/64, rotational-xor related-key distinguishers for up to 19 rounds of Simon-32/64 and rotational-xor differential related-key distinguishers for up (RK) 25 † -2 123.0 2 61.5 CP [KJK20] In what follows, we prove that the results marked by † are invalid while the distinguishers with ▷ have an experimental probability significantly higher than theoretically expected.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations