1986
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1986)112:4(329)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine Maintenance and Pavement Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An aggregate damage model for highway pavement performance analysis in Indiana resulted in the introduction of the concept of PSI-ESAL loss as an indicator of pavement deterioration and loss of serviceability [Fwa and Sinha, 1986]. In contrast to the traditional PSI-Age parameter, PSI-ESAL offers a more representative and quantitative measure of historical performance.…”
Section: Empirical Pavement Deterioration Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An aggregate damage model for highway pavement performance analysis in Indiana resulted in the introduction of the concept of PSI-ESAL loss as an indicator of pavement deterioration and loss of serviceability [Fwa and Sinha, 1986]. In contrast to the traditional PSI-Age parameter, PSI-ESAL offers a more representative and quantitative measure of historical performance.…”
Section: Empirical Pavement Deterioration Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past studies (Li and Sinha, 2000;Madanat and Mishalani, 1998;Fwa and Sinha, 1986and 1991Sinha et al, 1988), DRL has been widely used as a shortterm maintenance or rehabilitation effectiveness measure. Models predicting the PSI change or change in roughness as a function of pavement attributes, climate, unit expenditure, and maintenance or rehabilitation have been developed.…”
Section: Asphalt Concrete -On -Portland Cement Concrete Pavements Maimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying benefits using the area under the performance-time curve: There are two approaches: (i) a quantitative performance measure is developed to compare different overall pavement performances in various strategies Sinha, 1986 and1991), and (ii) quantitative values of user benefits for different pavement serviceability levels are established.…”
Section: Maximum Benefit Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) the climatic conditions are more severe in the North region in terms of precipitation and temperature conditions; (b) all things, including traffic loadings, pavement age, type and thickness, being equal, pavement condition deteriorates more rapidly in the North than in the South region. The pavement condition may be expressed either in PSI (pavement serviceability index), or roughness, or PSI-ESAL (equivalent single-axle load loss) [2],…”
Section: This Difference In Maintenance Practice Between the Two Regimentioning
confidence: 99%