1999
DOI: 10.17487/rfc2725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routing Policy System Security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RFC 2725 [2] introduces an authorization model to address the integrity of policy expressed in routing registries. Two new attributes were defined to support this authorization model: the "mnt-routes" and "mnt-lower" attributes.…”
Section: Rfc 2725 Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…RFC 2725 [2] introduces an authorization model to address the integrity of policy expressed in routing registries. Two new attributes were defined to support this authorization model: the "mnt-routes" and "mnt-lower" attributes.…”
Section: Rfc 2725 Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deletion and update of a route6 object is not different from other objects, as defined in RFC 2725 [2]. Creation rules of a route6 object is replicated here from the corresponding rules for route object in RFC 2725 [2] section 9.9.…”
Section: Authorization Model For Route6 Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data may be stored differently internal to a routing registry. The integrity of the distributed registry data requires the use of the authorization and authentication additions to RPSL described in [3].…”
Section: Data Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%