Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccp.2010.5606394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routing protocol for urban mobile networks based on geographical location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The group robot system has good expansibility and flexibility. In complex and chaotic terrain, compared with the arrangement of sensor nodes for localization and energy consumption monitoring, robot group cooperation in real‐time dynamic event detection and other tasks has a better effect 42‐44 . In the next step, we will research wireless localization and environmental information acquisition of swarm robots to improve localization accuracy and adaptability of the energy consumption monitoring system 45,46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group robot system has good expansibility and flexibility. In complex and chaotic terrain, compared with the arrangement of sensor nodes for localization and energy consumption monitoring, robot group cooperation in real‐time dynamic event detection and other tasks has a better effect 42‐44 . In the next step, we will research wireless localization and environmental information acquisition of swarm robots to improve localization accuracy and adaptability of the energy consumption monitoring system 45,46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AODV, TORA, and other reactive routing protocols are examples. The key benefits of routing which include proactive and reactive are low overhead, low power consumption, and low bandwidth requirements [5][6][7]. Because of routes in a MANET which are only constructed when needed, drawback of adopting reactive routing occurs that is there will be a delay between packets when transferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%