2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SA31 Methodological Approaches for Assessing Certainty of the Evidence in Umbrella Reviews: A Scoping Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature reports several advantages regarding this type of protocol publishing: (a) increased clarity surrounding systematic review conduct and reporting [ 33 , 38 ]; (b) it helps to reduce the bias of “positive” reviews selection; and (c) avoids the duplication of the research team’s efforts by making protocol publicly available, while conducting with more time the umbrella review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature reports several advantages regarding this type of protocol publishing: (a) increased clarity surrounding systematic review conduct and reporting [ 33 , 38 ]; (b) it helps to reduce the bias of “positive” reviews selection; and (c) avoids the duplication of the research team’s efforts by making protocol publicly available, while conducting with more time the umbrella review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study protocol is a review of reviews design using qualitative analysis. This design type is the highest level of evidence and is best known as the umbrella review [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are no official standards for determining the certainty of evidence in performing URs. 28 The certainty of evidence acquired from URs is a crucial element supporting decisions on the course of treatment or policy since it shows the confidence in the conclusions drawn from numerous studies. 29 Therefore, explicit directions for the process of assessing certainty in evidence in UR are expected to be provided after various stages of debate.…”
Section: How To Perform An Urmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GRADE provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating evidence, the majority of the essential information is not provided in the original study, which represents a restriction. 28 Reaserchers are not universally following the guidelines that have been published so far, and there remain issues that need to be solved, such as those that conflict with the guidelines or prevent their usage because of their omission when conducting URs. To ensure an accurate and rigorous assessment of evidence in URs, more sophisticated guidelines for the conduct of URs are required.…”
Section: Limitations Of Ursmentioning
confidence: 99%