2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Performed by Trainees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Median operation time was shortest in the proctor group and about 47 min shorter than in the training cases. This finding is comparable to outcomes of previous studies for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery [36][37][38][39]. Although EBL was statistically significantly different between the three groups (training vs. graduate vs. proctor: 50, 50, 20 ml; p < 0.001), this is probably not clinically relevant and did not translate into a higher rate of post-operative complications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Median operation time was shortest in the proctor group and about 47 min shorter than in the training cases. This finding is comparable to outcomes of previous studies for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery [36][37][38][39]. Although EBL was statistically significantly different between the three groups (training vs. graduate vs. proctor: 50, 50, 20 ml; p < 0.001), this is probably not clinically relevant and did not translate into a higher rate of post-operative complications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Using a random-effects model, trainees and expert surgeons were found to be similar in terms of proportion 12 Chester and Britton 15 Chester and Britton 15 Chester and Britton 15 Chester and Britton 15 Dalton et al 17 Dalton et al 17 Dalton et al 17 Dalton et al 17 Dalton et al 17 Hawkins et al 21 Hawkins et al 21 Hawkins et al 21 Hilska et al 19 Hilska et al 19 Isbister 13 Isbister 13 Isbister 13 Isbister 13 Khan et al 30 Langhoff et al 23 Langhoff et al 23 Li et al 14 Li et al 14 Pastor et al 22 Renwick et al 18 Renwick et al 18 Renwick et al 18 Singh and Aitken 25 Tytherleigh et al 24 Tytherleigh et al 24 Verheijen et al 26 Values in parentheses are 95 per cent confidence intervals. *Weighted mean difference (WMD) for duration of operation and odds ratio for other outcomes.…”
Section: Trainee Versus Expert Surgeon Case MIXmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Borowski et al 12 Chester and Britton 15 Costantino et al 29 Dalton et al 17 Hawkins et al 21 Hilska et al 19 Isbister 13 Khan et al 30 Krishna et al 16 Langhoff et al 23 Li et al 14 Pastor et al 22 Renwick et al 18 Singh and Aitken 25 Tytherleigh et al 24 Verheijen et al 26 Total Heterogeneity:…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these findings were not confirmed in a recent study on 991 consecutive laparoscopic resections [28]. Likewise, Langhoff et al suggested that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer can be performed safely by supervised trainees with good short-term results [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%