2017
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30047-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke (REVASCAT): 1-year follow-up of a randomised open-label trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
55
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These current results suggested that successful reperfu- Although previous prospective studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of endovascular therapy on long-term outcome [8,9], the association was not independent of the 90-days mRS scores in the REVASCAT study [8]. The different results from our current study could be attributed to the difference of a study design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These current results suggested that successful reperfu- Although previous prospective studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of endovascular therapy on long-term outcome [8,9], the association was not independent of the 90-days mRS scores in the REVASCAT study [8]. The different results from our current study could be attributed to the difference of a study design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…While our current study compared the successful reperfusion group and the unsuccessful reperfusion group, the REVASCAT study compared the thrombectomy group and the control group. In the thrombectomy group of the REVASCAT study, the rates of successful reperfusion, defined as mTICI score ≥2b, evaluated by a core lab and local investigators were 65.7 and 79.6% respectively [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 If a recurrence occurred, patients entered the acute phase again. In this case, transitions to health states were restricted to mRS scores equal to or greater than the previous mRS score.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discharge mRS may not accurately predict the 90 day mRS but it is most likely correct in 80% of cases 16. Additionally, it is important to highlight that the purpose of this paper was not to assess clinical outcome, as prior trials have already demonstrated better clinical outcomes with faster door to puncture times 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%