2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety diagnosis: Are we doing a good job?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen grouping methods were found among the 42 studies evaluated (Table 3), highlighting the use of section split (SS) (Al-Omari et al, 2020;Greibe, 2003;Guerrero-Barbosa and Santiago-Palacio, 2016;Halim et al, 2018;Hayidso et al, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2016;Qu et al, 2019;Saha et al, 2020;Sugiyanto et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2019), kernel density estimation (KDE) (Hegyi et al, 2017;Le et al, 2020aLe et al, , 2020bPleerux, 2020;Shafabakhsh et al, 2017;Soltani and Askari, 2014;Xie and Yan, 2013), network kernel density estimation (NKDE) (Al-Aamri et al, 2021;Fan et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2015;Xie and Yan, 2008), spatial autocorrelation (SA) (Chance Scott et al, 2016;Steenberghen et al, 2011;Ulak et al, 2019), community census (CC) (Dong et al, 2016;Dumbaugh et al, 2010;Vaz et al, 2017), and cells (Cui and Xie, 2021;Debrabant et al, 2018;Geurts et al, 2005;Xiao et al, 2021). Less frequently used were beta-binomial screening (Park and Sahaji, 2013b), city limits , DBSCAN (Szénási and Jankó, 2017), the Firefly algorithm (Yuan et al, 2020), Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) (Mansourkhaki et al, 2017), nearest neighbor (NN) (Rahman et al, 2020)…”
Section: Grouping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourteen grouping methods were found among the 42 studies evaluated (Table 3), highlighting the use of section split (SS) (Al-Omari et al, 2020;Greibe, 2003;Guerrero-Barbosa and Santiago-Palacio, 2016;Halim et al, 2018;Hayidso et al, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2016;Qu et al, 2019;Saha et al, 2020;Sugiyanto et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2019), kernel density estimation (KDE) (Hegyi et al, 2017;Le et al, 2020aLe et al, , 2020bPleerux, 2020;Shafabakhsh et al, 2017;Soltani and Askari, 2014;Xie and Yan, 2013), network kernel density estimation (NKDE) (Al-Aamri et al, 2021;Fan et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2015;Xie and Yan, 2008), spatial autocorrelation (SA) (Chance Scott et al, 2016;Steenberghen et al, 2011;Ulak et al, 2019), community census (CC) (Dong et al, 2016;Dumbaugh et al, 2010;Vaz et al, 2017), and cells (Cui and Xie, 2021;Debrabant et al, 2018;Geurts et al, 2005;Xiao et al, 2021). Less frequently used were beta-binomial screening (Park and Sahaji, 2013b), city limits , DBSCAN (Szénási and Jankó, 2017), the Firefly algorithm (Yuan et al, 2020), Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) (Mansourkhaki et al, 2017), nearest neighbor (NN) (Rahman et al, 2020)…”
Section: Grouping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the UCL criterion was applied to values estimated using regression models, compared to observed values (Guerrero-Barbosa and Santiago-Palacio, 2016), and using Ripley's K-function to compare K-observed and K-expected values for RTAs (Pleerux, 2020;Shafabakhsh et al, 2017). The empirical Bayes method was used to determine the expected proportions of RTAs that exceeded the threshold proportion, in situations with the same configuration (Park and Sahaji, 2013b). The UCL, guided by statistical quality control models, was adopted in analyses that used local WANs against expected WANs (Halim et al, 2018;Sugiyanto et al, 2017).…”
Section: Prioritization Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%