Salvage reoperations for complications threatening the viability of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)

Dehni, Nidal; Dozois, Roger R.; Remacle, G; Tiret, Emmanuel; Parc, R

doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(03)84113-6

Gastroenterology

2003

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)84113-6

|View full text |Cite

Salvage reoperations for complications threatening the viability of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)

Nidal Dehni¹,

Roger R. Dozois²,

G Remacle³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…-84 64 < 12 bowel motions per day, good control, patient satisfaction MacLean [30] 2002 Toronto, Canada 57 51 74 89 Less than 10 bowel motions per day Gorfine [28] 2003 New York, NY, USA 51 -66.7 86 Perfect or near perfect continence Baixauli [13] 2004 Cleveland, OH, USA 101 -74 50 Faecal seepage Dehni [33] 2005 Paris, France 64 13 94 50 Faecal incontinence Tekkis [31] 2006 London, UK 112 -79 -Mathis [32] 2009 Rochester, MN, USA 51 24 89 39 Faecal incontinence Remzi [34] 2009 Cleveland, OH, USA 241 -88 63 Rarely/no faecal incontinence Shawki [9] 2009 Weston, FL, USA 68 -56 -Remzi [18] 2015…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ileal pouch revision vs excision: short‐term (30‐day) outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) failure occurs in approximately 5%–10% of patients. We aimed to compare short‐term (30‐day) postoperative outcomes associated with pouch revision and pouch excision using a large international database. Our null hypothesis was that there is no statistically significant difference in overall postoperative complications between patients selected for pouch revision vs pouch excision. Methods Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User File from 2005 to 2016 we identified patients who underwent either IPAA revision via the combined abdominoperineal approach [Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 46712] or IPAA excision (CPT 45136). Differences in baseline characteristics and short‐term outcomes between groups were assessed with univariate and matched analyses. Results We identified 593 reoperative IPAA procedures: revision group 78 (13%) and excision group 515 (86%). The groups had similar age and body mass index (kg/m2), but the revision group had more women (65.4% vs 51.8%, P = 0.02) and fewer were on chronic steroids (3.9% vs 17.9%, P = 0.0008) relative to the excision group. Revision IPAA patients were more likely to have received a preoperative transfusion (5.1% vs 0.97%, P = 0.02). Revision and excision were associated with similar postoperative length of stay (9.3 vs 8.6 days, 0.44), mortality (nil vs 0.58%, respectively; P = 0.99) and short‐term morbidity (34.6% vs 40.2%, respectively; P = 0.88) at 30 days. Conclusions Pouch revision and excision have comparable short‐term postoperative outcomes, but pouch excision appears to be more commonly utilized. Increased awareness of the indications for pouch revision or referral to specialized centres may improve pouch revision rates.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ileal pouch revision vs excision: short‐term (30‐day) outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Salvage reoperations for complications threatening the viability of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Ileal pouch revision vs excision: short‐term (30‐day) outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Ileal pouch revision vs excision: short‐term (30‐day) outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About