2019
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24091778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Digestion and Combined Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Ultra-Low Gold Levels in Rocks

Abstract: The gold abundance in basic rocks, which normally varies between 0.5 and 5 ppb, has served as a very important indicator in many geoscience studies, including those focused on the planetary differentiation, redistribution of elements during the crustal process, and ore genesis. However, because gold is a monoisotopic element that exhibits a nugget effect, it is very difficult to quantify its ultra-low levels in rocks, which significantly limits our understanding of the origin of gold and its circulation betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(195 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since these interferences originate from the sample matrix, removal of interference‐causing elements from the matrix is normally practiced by methods such as precipitation, 63 solvent extraction64 and ion‐exchange chromatography 65 . Fire‐assay separation and preconcentration methods are the best for the determination of precious metals in geological materials 66–68 . Agatemor and Beauchemin 28 discussed the advantages and limitations of some of these sample pretreatment analyte–matrix separation methods for the ICP‐MS analysis of some geological materials.…”
Section: Origin and Types Of Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these interferences originate from the sample matrix, removal of interference‐causing elements from the matrix is normally practiced by methods such as precipitation, 63 solvent extraction64 and ion‐exchange chromatography 65 . Fire‐assay separation and preconcentration methods are the best for the determination of precious metals in geological materials 66–68 . Agatemor and Beauchemin 28 discussed the advantages and limitations of some of these sample pretreatment analyte–matrix separation methods for the ICP‐MS analysis of some geological materials.…”
Section: Origin and Types Of Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment methods before gold determination include dry ashing, [2][3][4] and wet acid digestion. Enrichment, such as precipitation, 5 ion exchange resin, 6 solvent extraction, [7][8][9] PUF adsorption, 10,11 extraction chromatography, 12 is followed. There are many testing methods for gold, including atomic absorption spectrometry, 13 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry 14,15 and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los tamaños ideales de partícula de la muestra son los menores o iguales a 0,075 mm (Osman Ali Salih, 2018). En el análisis de oro mediante ensayo al fuego se debe considerar que las recuperaciones de oro cuando está presente el teluro suelen ser bajas (Liu et al,2019;Santos-Munguía et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Una variante del ensayo al fuego tradicional es el cambio del plomo por níquel, pero se reportan varios problemas y bajas recuperaciones (Liu et al, 2019). Dentro de las técnicas para determinar oro, luego de su recuperación y purificación, se encuentra la espectroscopia de absorción atómica con llama, la espectroscopia de absorción atómica con horno de grafito, y la es-pectrometría de masas con plasma acoplado inductivamente, el requisito para utilizarlas es que el oro se encuentre en solución.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified