2004
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.657.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Protocols and Risk of Error Significance in Molecular Detection Tests for Fruit Trees Certification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The various nucleic acid-based detection protocols are fast and sensitive; however, they involve rather substantial sample pretreatment and are susceptible to errors. 32 Reliable detection of ASPV is further complicated since, owing to the frequently used grafting procedure, the wide distribution of ASPV is associated with high genetic variability. 33,34 Therefore, efforts were made to generate monoclonal antibodies as a basis of reliable serological enzyme immunoassays for fast routine determinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The various nucleic acid-based detection protocols are fast and sensitive; however, they involve rather substantial sample pretreatment and are susceptible to errors. 32 Reliable detection of ASPV is further complicated since, owing to the frequently used grafting procedure, the wide distribution of ASPV is associated with high genetic variability. 33,34 Therefore, efforts were made to generate monoclonal antibodies as a basis of reliable serological enzyme immunoassays for fast routine determinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, the routine ASPV detection relies on biological indexing by grafting or mechanical inoculation of infected tissues onto indicator hosts, but several efforts have been made to invent faster, more robust, and flexible detection protocols. The developed nucleic acid‐based detection protocols, such as RT‐PCR (1921) and molecular beacons (22), are sensitive but cannot fulfill the requirements of high‐throughput virus tests because they involve rather substantial sample pretreatment and are error prone (3). Recently, monoclonal antibodies have been also produced for serological identification of ASPV isolates in apple and pear protein extracts, and an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) protocol has been introduced using this monoclonal antibody (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct detection comprises the traditional viral isolation culture, as well as application of more recent methodologies, allowing the measurement of virus-specific antigens and genetic components. Although PCR-related methods, especially real-time PCR, have become widely accepted molecular tools for virus detection, typing and subtyping, their application is limited by a complicated procedure, susceptibility to contamination, and a high false-positive rate (3). Considering these drawbacks, detection of virus-specific antigens with various immunoassay protocols seems to be preferred for screening large number of samples (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%