2023
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202300139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling volume assessment for wearable multimodal optical diagnostic device

Abstract: The process and results of numerical Monte Carlo simulation of optical radiation propagation in laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) channels of a wearable diagnostic multimodal device are described in this paper. To achieve the goal, a multilayer skin model with different parameters of blood and melanin content and different distances between sources and radiation receivers was designed. The changes in the sampling (diagnostic) volume depending on the anatomical features of the bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited depth penetration: Wearable LDF devices typically have shallow depth penetration. According to Zharkikh et al., 14 who investigated the depth sensitivity of LDF, the method typically achieves a penetration depth of more than 2 mm, with a source-detector separation of more than 1 mm. This limitation may restrict their ability to measure microcirculation and hinder the assessment of perfusion in deeper tissues, which can be relevant in certain clinical scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited depth penetration: Wearable LDF devices typically have shallow depth penetration. According to Zharkikh et al., 14 who investigated the depth sensitivity of LDF, the method typically achieves a penetration depth of more than 2 mm, with a source-detector separation of more than 1 mm. This limitation may restrict their ability to measure microcirculation and hinder the assessment of perfusion in deeper tissues, which can be relevant in certain clinical scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%