2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcomatoid lung carcinomas show high levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and strong immune-cell infiltration by TCD3 cells and macrophages

Abstract: PD-L1 expression was higher in SC than in NSCLC as well as immune-cell infiltration by TCD3 cells and macrophages. This suggests that targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway could represent a new potential therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
115
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
19
115
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunotherapy targeting immune-checkpoint such as PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors might be of interest in this rare NSCLC subtype. PD-L1 expression in our study is high: from 53 to 90.2% as described in other studies [3,610]. PD-L1 expression in SC was found higher than in NSCLC in the same center with the same antibody and cutoff [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Immunotherapy targeting immune-checkpoint such as PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors might be of interest in this rare NSCLC subtype. PD-L1 expression in our study is high: from 53 to 90.2% as described in other studies [3,610]. PD-L1 expression in SC was found higher than in NSCLC in the same center with the same antibody and cutoff [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…PD-L1 expression in our study is high: from 53 to 90.2% as described in other studies [3,610]. PD-L1 expression in SC was found higher than in NSCLC in the same center with the same antibody and cutoff [3]. In NSCLC, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry has emerged as a biomarker predicting which patients are more likely to respond to PD/PD-L1 blockade.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And a final score of 0–2 was considered as negative expression (−, noted as 0); 3–4: weak positive expression (+, noted as 1); 6–8: moderate positive expression (++, noted as 2); and 9–12 was strong positive expression (+++, noted as 3) (10). For PD-L1, based on previous studies, the samples with stained tumor cells < 5% was defined as negative (−, scored as 0) (20, 21). For PD-L1 positive ≥5% samples, the expression level were further classified into weak positive (+, noted as 1), moderate positive (++, noted as 2), and strong positive expression (+++, noted as 3) according to staining intensity from light brown to brown and dark brown, correspondingly (22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%