2002
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scar Assessment Tools: Implications for Current Research

Abstract: Scarring is considered a major medical problem that leads to cosmetic and functional sequelae. Scar tissue is clinically distinguished from normal skin by an aberrant color, rough surface texture, increased thickness (hypertrophy), occurrence of contraction, and firmness. Marked histologic differences are the change in dermal architecture and the presence of cells such as the myofibroblast. Many assessment tools are available for analysis of pathologic conditions of the skin; however, there is no general agree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18,[90][91][92][93] However, KD in ethnic skin or otherwise does not always respond satisfactorily to current treatment modalities, which are often ill defined and lacking in high-quality evidence-based research. 94,95 Given the complex nature of KD management and the scarcity of effective treatment options, preventative measures should take precedence in management of KD. Presently, there is no levelone evidence of an effective treatment modality for the management of KD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,[90][91][92][93] However, KD in ethnic skin or otherwise does not always respond satisfactorily to current treatment modalities, which are often ill defined and lacking in high-quality evidence-based research. 94,95 Given the complex nature of KD management and the scarcity of effective treatment options, preventative measures should take precedence in management of KD. Presently, there is no levelone evidence of an effective treatment modality for the management of KD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this pilot study, vasculature of the cutaneous burn scar of a human subject was evaluated with the mOMAG microangiograms. Compared to a standard visual inspection of the burn scar, 40 the scar vascularity would be a potential indicator to assess the scar progression, providing early diagnosis and proper treatment of pathological scarring. 27 Vascular imaging was carried out over a 10-month-old scar resulting from an accident radiation burn with a laser on a left dorsal hand of a 34-year-old male subject.…”
Section: In Vivo Microangiographic Assessment Of Scarred Human Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queda por dilucidar qué factores pueden condicionar el desarrollo de una hiperfibrosis de este tipo, ya sean relacionados con el paciente, sus hábitos, capacidad de cicatrización, etc. ; también los factores relacionados con el procedimiento en sí y otros factores añadidos tales como complicaciones y desviaciones del curso postoperatorio normal (16). Independientemente de los posibles condicionantes de la hiperfibrosis acaecida en el caso que exponemos, fue necesario en nuestro caso la detección oportuna del proceso, el evitar la exacerbación del cuadro y una vez agotadas las terapéuticas tradicionales, intentar un procedimiento correctivo con una base empírica y siempre resguardando un margen de seguridad, atentos en todo momento a la correcta evolución postoperatoria del cuadro.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified