2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02264-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scat DNA provides important data for effective monitoring of mammal and bird biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review illustrates that eDNA can be used successfully with reptiles, although it is clear that success has been difficult to achieve in the past (Baker et al, 2020 ; van der Heyde et al, 2021 ). It is important to note that cases where eDNA has been unsuccessful are less likely to be published (Beng & Corlett, 2020 ), and there is likely a publication bias toward reptile eDNA studies that have had some level of success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This review illustrates that eDNA can be used successfully with reptiles, although it is clear that success has been difficult to achieve in the past (Baker et al, 2020 ; van der Heyde et al, 2021 ). It is important to note that cases where eDNA has been unsuccessful are less likely to be published (Beng & Corlett, 2020 ), and there is likely a publication bias toward reptile eDNA studies that have had some level of success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detecting reptile DNA from environmental samples is reputedly difficult to achieve (Adams et al, 2019 ; Baker et al, 2020 ; Kucherenko et al, 2018 ; van der Heyde et al, 2021 ), especially when compared to other animal taxa such as fish or amphibians (Adams, Hoekstra, et al, 2019 ; Raemy & Ursenbacher, 2018 ). Here, we review literature on eDNA studies of reptiles and summarize the utility of eDNA in reptile conservation and management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA metabarcoding is continuously being refined for more detailed multispecies detection (Creer et al, 2016), but we consider the aquatic eDNA metabarcoding method ready for large-scale monitoring of fish in European freshwater habitats. More terrestrial mammals might have been detected if eDNA from soil, dung or air samples had been included as well (Leempoel et al, 2020; Sales et al, 2020; Lynggaard et al, 2021; van der Heyde et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA metabarcoding approach has important applications for biomonitoring of species in diverse communities [ 25 ], and is particularly applied to restoration monitoring [ 24 ]. Additionally, recent practices in environmental DNA (eDNA) barcoding (i.e., simultaneous identification of species from multiple taxa within one environmental sample, using a specific fragment of DNA) demonstrated the advantage of using environmental bulk DNA extracts over DNA barcoding of individual organisms [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Following these recent advances, in this study, for the first time, we apply a “bulk” extraction of DNA from multiple nymphal individuals of L. delicatula .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%