2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenarios for upgrading and distribution of compressed and liquefied biogas — Energy, environmental, and economic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three most common methods to achieve this purity are water scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption and chemical (amine) absorption [17]. The methods differ in, for example, how much methane losses there are, how pure the end product/s is/are, how much energy was used in the upgrading and if it required any chemicals or special equipment [17,24]. Biomethane produced from upgrading can be used directly as fuel in two wayseither by compressing it to 200 bar (compressed biogas, CBG) or by cooling it down to a liquid at À162 C (liquefied biogas, LBG).…”
Section: Fuels Produced From Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The three most common methods to achieve this purity are water scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption and chemical (amine) absorption [17]. The methods differ in, for example, how much methane losses there are, how pure the end product/s is/are, how much energy was used in the upgrading and if it required any chemicals or special equipment [17,24]. Biomethane produced from upgrading can be used directly as fuel in two wayseither by compressing it to 200 bar (compressed biogas, CBG) or by cooling it down to a liquid at À162 C (liquefied biogas, LBG).…”
Section: Fuels Produced From Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To liquefy biomethane, an extra polishing step is often needed where the biomethane is purified even further. Gustafsson et al [24] compared different upgrading methods for CBG and LBG as well as ways to distribute the gas, and found that LBG requires more energy than CBG (0.03-0.04 kWh/MJ LBG instead of 0.02-0.03 kWh/MJ CBG), but LBG often seems to have less global warming impact than CBG due to reduced methane slip [24].…”
Section: Fuels Produced From Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations