Sciatic nerve fascicle differentiation on high‐resolution ultrasound with histological verification: An ex vivo study

Abstract

Introduction/AimsThe development of high‐resolution ultrasound (HRUS) has enabled the depiction of peripheral nerve microanatomy in vivo. This study compared HRUS fascicle differentiation to the structural depiction in histological cross‐sections (HCS).MethodsA human cadaveric sciatic nerve was marked with 10 surgical sutures, and HRUS image acquisition was performed with a 22‐MHz probe. The nerve was excised and cut into five segments for HCS preparation. Selected HCS were cross‐referenced to HRUS, with sutures to improve orientation. Sciatic nerve and fascicle contouring were performed to assess nerve and fascicular cross‐sectional area (CSA), fascicle count, and interfascicular distances. Three groups were defined based on HRUS fascicle differentiation in comparison to HCS, namely single fascicle (SF), fascicular cluster (FC), and no depiction (ND) group.ResultsOn cross‐referenced HRUS to HCS images, 58% of fascicles were differentiated. On HRUS, significantly larger fascicle CSA and smaller fascicle count were observed compared with HCS. Group analysis showed that 41% of fascicles were defined as SF, 47% as FC, and 12% as ND. The mean fascicle CSA in the ND group was 0.05 mm2. Compared with the SF, the FC had significantly larger fascicle CSA (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.4 mm2; p < .001) and shorter interfascicular distances (0.1 ± 0.04 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 μm; p < .001).DiscussionWhile HRUS can depict fascicular anatomy, only half of the fascicles visualized on HRUS directly correspond to single fascicles observed on HCS. The amount of interfascicular epineurium appears to influence the ability of HRUS to differentiate individual fascicles.