2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cic48465.2019.00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SciBlock: A Blockchain-Based Tamper-Proof Non-Repudiable Storage for Scientific Workflow Provenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it lacks implementation details. Fernando et al [49] argue that data stored in ProChain is data product rather than provenance. They propose SciBlock on Ethereum with a new data structure to additionally store temporal information, which is important to identify outdated results.…”
Section: Bc-assisted Bp Executionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it lacks implementation details. Fernando et al [49] argue that data stored in ProChain is data product rather than provenance. They propose SciBlock on Ethereum with a new data structure to additionally store temporal information, which is important to identify outdated results.…”
Section: Bc-assisted Bp Executionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors do not consider an environment where the provenance data is shared only between interested and duly authorized parties, like BlockFlow. Fernando et al [28] proposed a blockchain-based system called SciBlock to provide tamper-proof and reputable storage for scientific workflow provenance data in a distributed collaborative environment. In SciBlock, the authors, in capturing and storing provenance, do not distinguish between prospective, retrospective, and evolutionary provenance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent research suggests using blockchain technology for the development of research workflow solutions for provenance, reliability, and collaboration [52]- [57], and in different steps of the research activities to ensure transparency in data acquisition, data processing, research fund distribution, researchers' contribution and the publication review process [58]- [61].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%