2016
DOI: 10.1177/0267323116674110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science news in a closed and an open media market: A comparative content analysis of print and online science news in Denmark and the United Kingdom

Abstract: Most content analyses of science news are conducted in large Anglo-American media markets. However, we speculate that the intimacy between sources and journalists in small media markets can influence science coverage. Here, we present a comparative analysis of Danish and British newspaper science news in 2012. We find that in both countries science news amounts to about 4% of the total news flow. We also observe that Danish science news more often than British science news is triggered by political events, giv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, research in this regard is very scarce. The only two research works that have been conducted on the presence of Humanities and Social Sciences in the media, based on the pioneering meta-analysis (Schäfer, 2012), present very diverging data that vary from figures indicating a presence of less than 30% to more than 60% of humanistic disciplines, depending on the criterion adopted (Šuljok and Vuković, 2013;Summ and Volpers, 2016;Vestergård and Nielsen, 2016). In a macro-study conducted more than a decade ago on a group of 13 countries (Bentley and Kyvik, 2011), excluding Spain, all knowledge areas were considered.…”
Section: The Decline Of Humanities and Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, research in this regard is very scarce. The only two research works that have been conducted on the presence of Humanities and Social Sciences in the media, based on the pioneering meta-analysis (Schäfer, 2012), present very diverging data that vary from figures indicating a presence of less than 30% to more than 60% of humanistic disciplines, depending on the criterion adopted (Šuljok and Vuković, 2013;Summ and Volpers, 2016;Vestergård and Nielsen, 2016). In a macro-study conducted more than a decade ago on a group of 13 countries (Bentley and Kyvik, 2011), excluding Spain, all knowledge areas were considered.…”
Section: The Decline Of Humanities and Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, research in this regard is very scarce. The only two research works that have been conducted on the presence of Humanities and Social Sciences in the media, based on the pioneering meta-analysis (Schäfer, 2012), present very disparate data that vary from figures indicating a presence of less than 30% to more than 60% of humanistic disciplines, depending on the criterion adopted (Šuljok and Vuković, 2013;Summ and Volpers, 2016;Vestergård and Nielsen, 2016). In a macro-study conducted more than a decade ago on a group of 13 countries (Bentley and Kyvik, 2011), excluding Spain, all knowledge areas were considered.…”
Section: The Decline Of Humanities and Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, research in this regard is very scarce. The only two research works that have been conducted on the presence of Humanities and Social Sciences in the media, based on the pioneering meta-analysis (Schäfer, 2012), present very disparate data that vary from figures indicating a presence of less than 30% to more than 60% of humanistic disciplines, depending on the criterion adopted (Šuljok and Vuković, 2013;Summ and Volpers, 2016;Vestergård and Nielsen, 2016). In a macro-study conducted more than a decade ago on a group of 13 countries (Bentley and Kyvik, 2011), excluding Spain, all knowledge areas were considered.…”
Section: The Decline Of Humanities and Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%