2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science versus empiricism

Abstract: Few debates within dentistry have aroused such strong feelings as the issue of orthodontic growth guidance. Most orthodontists consider that appliances have little influence beyond the teeth and alveolus. If there is not room, it is argued, extractions are inevitable. Despite this a sizable minority, mostly of general dentists, believe that it is possible to influence skeletal form significantly. Why is there such lack of consensus?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance