Scientific Challenges in the Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials

Abstract

Background:Food contact articles (FCAs) are manufactured from food contact materials (FCMs) that include plastics, paper, metal, glass, and printing inks. Chemicals can migrate from FCAs into food during storage, processing, and transportation. Food contact materials’ safety is evaluated using chemical risk assessment (RA). Several challenges to the RA of FCAs exist.Objectives:We review regulatory requirements for RA of FCMs in the United States and Europe, identify gaps in RA, and highlight opportunities for improving the protection of public health. We intend to initiate a discussion in the wider scientific community to enhance the safety of food contact articles.Discussion:Based on our evaluation of the evidence, we conclude that current regulations are insufficient for addressing chemical exposures from FCAs. RA currently focuses on monomers and additives used in the manufacture of products, but it does not cover all substances formed in the production processes. Several factors hamper effective RA for many FCMs, including a lack of information on chemical identity, inadequate assessment of hazardous properties, and missing exposure data. Companies make decisions about the safety of some food contact chemicals (FCCs) without review by public authorities. Some chemical migration limits cannot be enforced because analytical standards are unavailable.Conclusion:We think that exposures to hazardous substances migrating from FCAs require more attention. We recommend a) limiting the number and types of chemicals authorized for manufacture and b) developing novel approaches for assessing the safety of chemicals in FCAs, including unidentified chemicals that form during or after production. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP644

Benchmarking the in Vitro Toxicity and Chemical Composition of Plastic Consumer Products

“…11 While the risk of starting substances and additives is evaluated prior to the authorization of FCMs in many countries, 12 this approach disregards unexpected and unknown compounds present in the final product (e.g., NIAS), as well as mixture toxicity. 13 To address these limitations, in vitro and in vivo bioassays can be used to assess the toxicity of the whole migrate leaching from the final product. 14,15 Compared to the chemical analysis of selected target compounds, bioassays integrate the toxicity of mixtures leaching from plastics including known chemicals with unknown toxicity and truly unknown compounds.…”

A novel natural coating for food preservation: Effectiveness on microbial growth and physicochemical parameters

“…Regulation of phthalates and other plasticizers has been increasing, especially in the EU, with the Commission Regulation 10/2011 removing many plasticizers as food contact materials (FCM) or limiting their migration limits. Overall, and even after legislation has reduced the load of plasticizers, concerns still linger, due to a lack of global legislation and imported goods from countries where legislation is less restrictive (Muncke et al, 2017;Nerin, Canellas, & Vera, 2018). In recent years, research is being focused on alternative bio-based non-toxic plastics and plasticisers to substitute synthetic counterparts.…”

Exploring the chemistry of complex samples by tentative identification and semiquantification: A food contact material case

“…Yet, even untargeted methods still have a too strong dependence on preexisting knowledge, and available sources of data require extensive cleaning and pruning prior to use in untargeted methodology . Dealing with complex samples, especially to ensure human safety, requires a level of discovery that targeted or even some untargeted analyses do not currently provide …”