2015
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2460266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scintillation Detector Timing Resolution; A Study by Ray Tracing Software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CRT of the DSR detector is also better than the value of ~160 ps FWHM previously obtained with thinner (10 mm) monolithic crystals based on Ca-codoped LSO:Ce, which in fact is a significantly faster scintillator than standard LYSO:Ce (Spurrier et al 2008, ter Weele et al 2015a. The improvement in the DSR detector is probably due to the smaller transit time spread of the scintillation photons inside the crystal, which on average undergo a smaller number of reflections before they are detected (ter Weele et al 2015b(ter Weele et al , 2015c. Also the increased number of timestamps acquired may contribute to the CRT improvement (Seifert et al 2012b).…”
Section: Time Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The CRT of the DSR detector is also better than the value of ~160 ps FWHM previously obtained with thinner (10 mm) monolithic crystals based on Ca-codoped LSO:Ce, which in fact is a significantly faster scintillator than standard LYSO:Ce (Spurrier et al 2008, ter Weele et al 2015a. The improvement in the DSR detector is probably due to the smaller transit time spread of the scintillation photons inside the crystal, which on average undergo a smaller number of reflections before they are detected (ter Weele et al 2015b(ter Weele et al , 2015c. Also the increased number of timestamps acquired may contribute to the CRT improvement (Seifert et al 2012b).…”
Section: Time Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Given that, we wanted to study and compare the timing performance obtained due to different acquisition systems. However, it is important to mention that these timing resolutions would be degraded in a PET-ToF scanner with longer crystals due to light absorption and time dispersion in larger crystals [13,14]. The increase of the crystal cross-section also leads to deterioration in the timing performance [8].…”
Section: Jinst 12 P04016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the GEANT4 and GATE (Agostinelli et al 2003, Jan et al 2004 toolkits for particle transport are widely used. Although the main applications are in high energy, nuclear and accelerator applications, some investigators have used GEANT4 for the modelling of light transport in radiation detectors (Meo et al 2009, Bobin et al 2010, van der Laan et al 2010, Hirano et al 2012, Ghadiri and Khorsandi 2015, Ranjbar 2015, Bobin et al 2016, Játékos et al 2016. GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission) focuses more on nuclear imaging and radiotherapy with a scripted user interface.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%