1992
DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70005-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
103
1
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
103
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results suggest that maleoffspring T cells present in PB and/or skin of women with SSc exhibit a functional profile prevalently oriented toward Th2 rather than Th1 cytokine production in response to stimulation with maternal MHC antigens. This finding supports the concept that fetal cells found in the PB and/or skin of women with SSc are functionally similar to those responsible for cGVHD in experimental animal models (9,10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, the results suggest that maleoffspring T cells present in PB and/or skin of women with SSc exhibit a functional profile prevalently oriented toward Th2 rather than Th1 cytokine production in response to stimulation with maternal MHC antigens. This finding supports the concept that fetal cells found in the PB and/or skin of women with SSc are functionally similar to those responsible for cGVHD in experimental animal models (9,10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…2 The precise incidence of ScGVHD is not known but may occur in ϳ 13% of patients who develop cGVHD. 3,4 Although ScGVHD is not an acute life-threatening manifestation, widespread involvement may lead to significant functional disability and morbidity. 1 Skin ulceration and poor wound healing associated with skin fibrosis increases the risk of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD3 T-cell dose in the graft, eosinophilia, positive antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), and antecedent nonsclerotic cGVHD skin involvement have been proposed as markers of ScGVHD 4 ; however, previous series included only small samples of patients and retrospective study designs, and registry and cancer center data fail to distinguish between sclerotic and nonsclerotic cutaneous manifestations of cGVHD. [2][3][4][8][9][10][11] The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Project recently proposed clear definitions of the sclerotic features of cGVHD, 12 but it will take many years to prospectively collect a significant number of patients with this rare cGVHD subset. The NIH cGVHD Natural History cohort comprises a unique referral population of cGVHD patients with significant (63% NIH global score of "severe") refractory disease (median previous therapies ϭ 4) who undergo a comprehensive prospective multisystem evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 Although sclerotic cGvHD is not an acute life-threatening manifestation, severe sclerotic cGvHD may lead to significant functional disability and morbidity. 3 This form of cGvHD has a negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) for patients. The response to topical interventions is poor and sclerotic cGvHD is often refractory to systemic therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%