2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2018.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Score-level fusion for cancelable multi-biometric verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the performance of our method, we compare our proposed hybrid fusion scheme with other recent methodologies in literature. Besides hybrid fusion methods [12,37], we include few other recent state-of-the-art fusion approaches based on score level [25,18,15,22,9] and decision level fusion [31,17]. As described in performance evaluation, it can be observed that the proposed method performs optimally than the other approaches with respect to EER (see Figure 4 -6).…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Proposed Hybrid Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the performance of our method, we compare our proposed hybrid fusion scheme with other recent methodologies in literature. Besides hybrid fusion methods [12,37], we include few other recent state-of-the-art fusion approaches based on score level [25,18,15,22,9] and decision level fusion [31,17]. As described in performance evaluation, it can be observed that the proposed method performs optimally than the other approaches with respect to EER (see Figure 4 -6).…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Proposed Hybrid Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistical analysis of unprotected templates is carried out to estimate the main parameters of such schemes. Dwivedi & Dey (2019) proposed a method to obtain cancelable templates by using log-Gabor filters with phase quantization, followed by the generation of biometric codes. Score level fusion from multiple biometric templates are used for authentication yielding better results in comparison to unibiometric systems with better accuracy.…”
Section: Social Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROC of the dual iris system Table 3. Accuracy and error for vaious approaches Iris recognition systems Accuracy (%) FAR (%) FRR (%) EER (%) Iftakhar and Ashraful Approach [11] 99.92 0.00 9.96 -DST approach [12] ---1 R. Dwivedi and S. Dey [13] 98.89 --0.69 Proposal dual iris authentication system 99.96 0.00 3.89 2…”
Section: S Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. Dwivedi and S. Dey [13] proposed a cancelable multibiometric system using score level fusion. The fusion of scores was applied by MC weighting at first level and RA weighting at the second level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%