2015
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers

Abstract: The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are noted for their increasing participation in science and technology. The governments of these countries have been boosting their investments in research and development to become part of the group of nations doing research at a world-class level. This study investigates the development of the BRICS countries in the domain of top-cited papers (top 10% and 1% most frequently cited papers) between 1990 and 2010. To assess the extent to which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion might have various reasons. There are similar findings in the literature (Bornmann, Wagner & Leydesdorff, 2015;Bauer, Leydesdorff & Bornmann, 2015). In addition, the USA has more journals, which accept educational research articles, than other countries.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This conclusion might have various reasons. There are similar findings in the literature (Bornmann, Wagner & Leydesdorff, 2015;Bauer, Leydesdorff & Bornmann, 2015). In addition, the USA has more journals, which accept educational research articles, than other countries.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It must be pointed out that the focus of this paper is on the performance of South Africa in its priority areas, while the other BRIC countries are used for comparative purposes only. 6 Considering previous work, Bornmann et al (2015) found that the BRICS countries, with the exception of Russia, have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top-cited countries worldwide. While that study did not have a specific focus on the areas as considered here, their analysis is in line with the findings presented in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some studies have considered the scientific outputs (Bornmann, Wagner, & Leydesdorff, 2015), collaboration within the grouping (Finardi, 2015), and the comparison with other country groupings (Yi, Qi, & Wu, 2013). Additionally, studies where countries in the same grouping are compared are common practice; for example, studies have been done looking at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), EU27 and Association of South East Asian (ASEAN) countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indicators namely as total numbers of publication, [52,53] citation analysis, [54,55] h-index, [56] g-index, [57] years of publication, [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] collaboration between countries [59] and others. Difference indicators can give difference outline and indication towards research.…”
Section: Indicators In Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%