2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening criteria for reliable U–Pb geochronology and oxygen isotope analysis in uranium-rich zircons: A case study from the Suzhou A-type granites, SE China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be mentioned that the Th-U concentrations are below values where zircon damage would be observed (Gao et al 2014;White and Ireland 2012), and, as can be seen in Fig. 4, are actually optimal and give less deviation.…”
Section: Syenite Of Podzamek (Podz2)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It should be mentioned that the Th-U concentrations are below values where zircon damage would be observed (Gao et al 2014;White and Ireland 2012), and, as can be seen in Fig. 4, are actually optimal and give less deviation.…”
Section: Syenite Of Podzamek (Podz2)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, in addition to calculating the total dose, it is desirable to estimate the amount of actual damage in a domain of interest. For zircons below the first percolation point, the amount of preserved radiation damage has been estimated from broadening and shifting toward lower wavenumber of Raman bands as measured in reflectance mode at 1 μm-scale Nasdala et al 2001bNasdala et al , 2003Pidgeon et al 2013;Gao et al 2014;Wang et al 2014).…”
Section: Radiation Damage In Zirconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing use of in situ techniques for spot analysis of sub-domains of a zircon reinforces the importance of evaluating the localized effects of radiation damage, which can facilitate elemental and isotopic exchange and cause erroneous results for measurements of U-Pb age White and Ireland 2012); oxygen isotope ratios (Valley et al 1994;Valley 2003;Cavosie et al 2005;Booth et al 2005; Gao et al 2014; Wang et al 2014), and trace elements Commonly achieved spatial resolution and detection range for microanalysis. APM = atom probe microscopy; APT = atom probe tomography; EDS = energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry; EELS = electron energy loss spectroscopy; EPMA = electron-probe microanalysis; SEM = scanning electron microscopy; SIMS = secondary ion mass spectrometry; (S)TEM = (scanning) transmission electron microscopy; WDS = wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectrometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectra of the zircon standardsin Temora, Plesovice, and 91500 with U concentration are also displayed for comparison. They experienced very few alpha decay/recoil events (White & Ireland, ; Gao et al ., ). In these spectra of zircon standards, peaks are well defined and sharp.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%