2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(04)01308-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for library-assisted identification and fully validated quantification of 22 beta-blockers in blood plasma by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, for TDM studies, a simple and fast procedure is preferred. Liquid-liquid extraction, 11 solid-phase extraction, 12 and protein precipitation (PPT) 13 are the main techniques used to pretreat the samples prior to monitor levels of drugs in plasma, serum, and urine samples. These methods suffer from high consumption of organic solvents and relatively long processing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for TDM studies, a simple and fast procedure is preferred. Liquid-liquid extraction, 11 solid-phase extraction, 12 and protein precipitation (PPT) 13 are the main techniques used to pretreat the samples prior to monitor levels of drugs in plasma, serum, and urine samples. These methods suffer from high consumption of organic solvents and relatively long processing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the results obtained by our method with others is clearly shown in Table 1. As can be seen, the detection limits of AT and ME, obtained by our method, were lower than that of HPLC coupling with a capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detector (HPLC-C4D), 14 HPLC-ECL 17 and CE-UV, 21 and were comparable to HPLC-MS, 16 but were higher than that of HPLC-MS/MS. 15 …”
Section: Reproducibility Detection Limits and Linearitymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…6,7 However, the sensitivity of these methods was limited. The most widely used were chromatographic techniques, such as gas chromatography (GC), 8,9 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and urtra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). 18 Among them, expensive columns and costly apparatus were needed, and the analysis time was relatively long.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the proposed method was approximately 600, 60 and 14 times higher than that of HPLC with amperometric detection [17], ELISA [18] and HPLC with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry [19]. Although the sensitivity of the proposed method was comparable with that of HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry [20], the proposed method does not require expensive and elaborate instruments.…”
Section: Calibration Curve Detection Limit and Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%