2013
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2012.729284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for mild traumatic brain injury in OEF-OIF deployed US military: An empirical assessment of VHA's experience

Abstract: VHA's TBI screening process is inclusive and has utility in referring patients with current symptoms to appropriate care. More than 90% of those evaluated received further VHA care and confirmatory evaluations were associated with significantly higher average utilization. Generalizability is limited to those who seek VHA healthcare.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…False positive screens for TBI may occur if the Veteran has other conditions, including PTSD or other conditions that have concussion-like symptoms, such as hearing loss and vestibular changes [21]. The proportion of screened TBI Veterans who completed a secondary TBI assessment and subsequently received a physician diagnosis of TBI was 53 percent, which is consistent with the proportion of approximately 60 percent found in other studies [22][23]. The reported symptom prevalence was similar in both the screened TBI and the confirmed TBI groups (70% vs 72%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…False positive screens for TBI may occur if the Veteran has other conditions, including PTSD or other conditions that have concussion-like symptoms, such as hearing loss and vestibular changes [21]. The proportion of screened TBI Veterans who completed a secondary TBI assessment and subsequently received a physician diagnosis of TBI was 53 percent, which is consistent with the proportion of approximately 60 percent found in other studies [22][23]. The reported symptom prevalence was similar in both the screened TBI and the confirmed TBI groups (70% vs 72%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, the TBI screen, in part, fulfills the intended goal of population-based screening in detecting postdeployment problems if they are present and has been shown to lead to increased VA care utilization, although we do not know whether this care was appropriate or indicated [37]. At the same time, the TBI screen may be too nonspecific and have unintended iatrogenic consequences as argued by Hoge et al, who raise the concern that the current TBI screening process may result in the misattribution of cognitive and other postconcussive symptoms to mTBI, when in fact, these problems are more likely due to conditions and diagnoses other than mTBI [38][39].…”
Section: Memory and Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who report a prior TBI diagnosis upon screening are offered a referral for follow-up treatment. Patients without a prior TBI diagnosis are asked four sets of TBI screening questions regarding (1) events that increase TBI risk, (2) immediate symptoms following the event, (3) new or worsening symptoms postevent, and (4) current symptoms. Patients endorsing one or more questions in each of the four sections screen positive and are offered a referral for a VA comprehensive TBI evaluation (CTBIE) [11,19,[21][22].…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injury Screening and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent estimates indicate self-reported or clinician-confirmed traumatic brain injury (TBI) ranging from 6.8 to 22.8 percent of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) servicemembers and Veterans [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Blast (e.g., from bombs or improvised explosive devices [IEDs]) is the most prevalent mechanism of mTBI for OIF/OEF servicemembers [7][8][9], and vehicular accidents and falls [4,6] are other common etiologies of TBI among OIF/OEF servicemembers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation