2006
DOI: 10.5981/jjhnc.32.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Test for Dysphagia in Postoperative Oral Cancer Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, five articles determined aspiration by observing swallowing sounds using cervical auscultation. In the aforementioned study by Watanabe et al (2006), the sensitivity was low, at 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36–0.72), and the specificity was high, at 0.96 (95% CI: 0.88–1.00) (Sugimoto et al, 2010; Watanabe et al, 2006). Conversely, Nozue et al (2017) reported a high sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65–0.79) and low specificity of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.44–0.55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, five articles determined aspiration by observing swallowing sounds using cervical auscultation. In the aforementioned study by Watanabe et al (2006), the sensitivity was low, at 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36–0.72), and the specificity was high, at 0.96 (95% CI: 0.88–1.00) (Sugimoto et al, 2010; Watanabe et al, 2006). Conversely, Nozue et al (2017) reported a high sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65–0.79) and low specificity of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.44–0.55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[Description]. A total of 336 studies were identified, and 13 observational studies were used for the systematic review after screening (Borr et al, 2007;Caviedes et al, 2010;Leslie et al, 2004;Nozue et al, 2017;Oshige et al, 2012;Santamato et al, 2009;Stroud et al, 2002;Shaw et al, 2004;Tamura et al, 2008Watanabe et al, 2006.…”
Section: Cq6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation