Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1997.624200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seabottom roughness measurement by aquatic walking robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 2: in Example 1, by the MM value (7,8,12,11,6,13,5,3,4,9,10,2,1) between F (1) and F (2) : (1) is equivalent to (1<1>,2<2>) in T (2) , because the connecting facets of the 12th module of F (1) and the 2st module of F (2) are class-I facets, and the connecting facets of the 13th module in F (1) and the 1st module in F (2) are class-I facets too. ᭹ The connection set C (1) (2) , and every connection in C (1) have an equivalent connection in C (2) and vice versa, thus C (1) is equivalent to C (2) .…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Example 2: in Example 1, by the MM value (7,8,12,11,6,13,5,3,4,9,10,2,1) between F (1) and F (2) : (1) is equivalent to (1<1>,2<2>) in T (2) , because the connecting facets of the 12th module of F (1) and the 2st module of F (2) are class-I facets, and the connecting facets of the 13th module in F (1) and the 1st module in F (2) are class-I facets too. ᭹ The connection set C (1) (2) , and every connection in C (1) have an equivalent connection in C (2) and vice versa, thus C (1) is equivalent to C (2) .…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be used in many complex occasions such as obstructive offshore explorations, inconvenient underwater salvages, intricate oceanic structure inspections etc., where the conventional ROVs/AUVs 1,2 can't work well. Compared with conventional underwater explorations tools, 3 the UMSR robots have the following advantages:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (Todd, 1985); believed that the use of hexapod robots would provide a more robust platform for applications, since it can support more weight than bipeds or quadrupeds. Examples of application of hexapod robots include the walking manipulator (Schraft et al, 2000); inspection and construction robots, rosy I and II (IEEE and Fraunhofer, 2008); and aquarobot for underwater operation (Akizono et al, 1997). The gait control problem of a hexapod is an extensively studied subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers [3] believed that the use of six-legged robots would provide a more robust platform for applications, since hexapods can support more weights than bipeds or quadrupeds. Examples of application six-legged robots include, the walking manipulator by Plustech Oy [3], inspection and construction robots, Rosy I and II [4], and Aquarobot for underwater operation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, however, nearly all gaits developed are based upon a simplified rectangular two-dimensional (2-D) model which limits the robot design. Although there are several hexapods (Silex [12], Aquarobot [5], Katharina [13], Odex [14] etc.) built in hexagonal architectures, few analytical comparisons on gait properties have been made between rectangular and hexagonal architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%