2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for a physiologically meaningful parameter for aortic biomechanics—is energy loss the way?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stemming from the Commentary by Tang and colleagues 1 on our article, 2 we were excited to be invited to elaborate more on the biaxial ex vivo biomechanical parameters for assessing ascending aortic aneurysms. Particularly, Tang and colleagues 2 raise an excellent point regarding the limitations of ex vivo testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stemming from the Commentary by Tang and colleagues 1 on our article, 2 we were excited to be invited to elaborate more on the biaxial ex vivo biomechanical parameters for assessing ascending aortic aneurysms. Particularly, Tang and colleagues 2 raise an excellent point regarding the limitations of ex vivo testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research group is cautiously optimistic about energy loss as presented by Chung and colleagues. 3 We are very excited to see the rigorous analysis conducted by Tang and colleagues 1 , 4 on sensitivity of energy loss as well as the meaningful discussion on the physics behind this parameter. Studies like the one by Tang and colleagues 4 raise our confidence in using this parameter in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%