2004
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seckel syndrome exhibits cellular features demonstrating defects in the ATR-signalling pathway

Abstract: To date, the only reported genetic defect identified in the developmental disorder, Seckel syndrome, is a mutation in ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR). Seckel syndrome is clinically and genetically heterogeneous and whether defects in ATR significantly contribute to Seckel syndrome is unclear. Firstly, we characterize ATR-Seckel cells for their response to DNA damage. ATR-Seckel cells display impaired phosphorylation of ATR-dependent substrates, impaired G2/M checkpoint arrest and elevated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
139
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DLD-ATR-Seckel cells that had been treated with UV 30 min before labeling showed a markedly reduced BrdU-positive fraction as compared with wildtype DLD1 (Figure 5d). This suggests that ATR is essential for S-phase recovery following exposure to UV, consistent with earlier studies (Osborn et al, 2002;Alderton et al, 2004). IR treatment, however, caused decreased BrdU uptake in both cell lines, consistent with the observed decrease in thymidine uptake (Figure 5a).…”
Section: Ir-dependent S-phase Checkpoint Is Intact In Atr-deficient Csupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DLD-ATR-Seckel cells that had been treated with UV 30 min before labeling showed a markedly reduced BrdU-positive fraction as compared with wildtype DLD1 (Figure 5d). This suggests that ATR is essential for S-phase recovery following exposure to UV, consistent with earlier studies (Osborn et al, 2002;Alderton et al, 2004). IR treatment, however, caused decreased BrdU uptake in both cell lines, consistent with the observed decrease in thymidine uptake (Figure 5a).…”
Section: Ir-dependent S-phase Checkpoint Is Intact In Atr-deficient Csupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Analysis of ATR transcripts by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR showed the appearance of a major amplified product with a size (295 bp) that was consistent with skipping of exon 9 in DLD-ATR-HET and DLD-ATR-Seckel cells (Figure 1c Immunoblotting revealed a decreased amount of ATR protein in DLD-ATR-HET cells, whereas ATR protein was undetectable in DLD-ATR-Seckel cells (Figure 1d). A significant phenotype previously observed in cells from ATR-Seckel patients, and directly attributed to ATR deficiency, is a marked sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation (UV) (O'Driscoll et al, 2003;Alderton et al, 2004). As measured by clonogenic survival, the DLD-ATR-Seckel cells were approximately 10-fold more sensitive to UV than wild-type DLD1 over a range of doses (Figure 2a), thereby providing functional confirmation of ATR deficiency in this engineered cell line.…”
Section: Knock-in Cells Recapitulate Seckel Syndrome Phenotypessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…2D). Similarly, when the Seckel cell line GM09703 (32), which retains f50% of ATR protein level compared with GM02188, was treated with 40 or 60 Amol/L of CNDAC followed by colcemid, cells exhibited mitotic scorings of 9% or 14%, respectively, relative to that of colcemid alone (P < 0.01). In contrast, another cell line, GM018367, which is derived from a Seckel syndrome patient with a splicing mutation (2101A!G) in the ATR gene (33) and has little residual expression of ATR, presented a mitotic index of 26% in response to colcemid alone.…”
Section: Atr Is Required For Optimal G 2 Checkpoint Activation By Cndacmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is thought that ATR-ATRIP, as part of the DNA replication machinery, associated with RPA, monitors single stranded DNA damage during the progression of DNA replication fork elongation (Niida and Nakanishi, 2006;Shechter et al, 2004b). In addition, ATR functions in both S and M phases include regulating late DNA replication origin firing, replication fork elongation, restarting stalled replication forks and involvement in centrosome stability (Shechter et al, 2004a;Cha and Kleckner, 2002;Sorensen et al, 2004;Friedel et al, 2009;Alderton et al, 2004;Smith et al, 1998).…”
Section: Atr Activation In Response To Single Strand Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seckel syndrome is clinically characterised by dwarfism, abnormal brain development and microcephaly (Majewski and Goecke, 1982). Seckel cells show higher sensitivity to replication fork stalling agents and illustrate defects in downstream ATR DNA damage responses exemplified by impaired H2AX, Rad17, Nbs1 P53, and Chk1 phosphorylation (O'Driscoll et al, 2003;Alderton et al, 2004). In addition, Seckel cells exposed to UV were unable to execute the G2/M checkpoint (the G2/M checkpoint is described in section 1.4.3) (Alderton et al, 2004).…”
Section: Atr Activation In Response To Single Strand Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 99%