2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure fragile watermarking method for image authentication with improved tampering localisation and self-recovery capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the PSNR values of the test images are more than 51 dB, which objectively verify the invisibility of the watermark. To further test the precision of tamper localization, two evaluation indexes including the false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR) are employed in this paper [21]. The FPR refers to the ratio of authentic pixels that are falsely detected as distorted pixels, and the FNR is the ratio of tampered pixels that are incorrectly detected as authentic pixels.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the PSNR values of the test images are more than 51 dB, which objectively verify the invisibility of the watermark. To further test the precision of tamper localization, two evaluation indexes including the false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR) are employed in this paper [21]. The FPR refers to the ratio of authentic pixels that are falsely detected as distorted pixels, and the FNR is the ratio of tampered pixels that are incorrectly detected as authentic pixels.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.9 shows that, tampering attacks can be detected and localized accurately using the first proposed scheme. Figs Now, we will compare the performance of the first proposed scheme with other existing schemes like Chang et al [34] scheme, Lin et al [35] scheme, Bravo-Solorio et al [36] scheme and Sumalatha et al [31] scheme. The comparison is based on the main quality factors of fragile watermarking scheme which are the imperceptibility performance that is evaluated using PSNR measure and the tamper detection accuracy which is measured using the tamper detection rate as shown in Table.2.…”
Section: Performance Of the Two Proposed Schemes Under Tampering Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years numerous image authentication techniques have been devised in pixel domain [1,2] and transform domain, e.g., the Karhunen-Loève transform, [3,4]. Soft computing techniques [5] have been extensively used to improve the efficiency of the watermarking schemes [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%