Securitised development and Palestinian authoritarianism under Fayyadism

Tartir, Alaa

doi:10.1080/14678802.2015.1100016

Cited by 38 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At worst, the enhanced functionality of the PA's security forces and the reformed style of governance that was defined through security collaboration with Israel, resulted in creating authoritarian transformations and criminalising resistance against the Israeli occupation, and as such directly and indirectly sustained it. (Tartir 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It argues that the Oslo Accords and Arafatism (Yasser Arafat's style of governance) saw an increase in security force personnel but the proliferation was associated with higher levels of insecurity and coupled with high levels of corruption, patronage-based politics and personalised Tartir, A 2015 The Evolution and Reform of Palestinian Security Forces 1993-2013. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 4(1): 46, pp.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Evolution and Reform of Palestinian Security Forces 1993–2013

Tartir

2015

Stability: International Journal of Security &Amp; Development

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution and Reform of Palestinian Security Forces 1993–2013

Tartir

2015

Stability: International Journal of Security &Amp; Development

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Palestinian civil society movements were increasingly suppressed by the Palestinian Authority security apparatus (Tartir, 2018) in coordination with its Israeli counterpart. Even more so, for the past 10 years, there has been more rigorous discussions and research on the limitations—and impossibility—of state-building while subjected to a settler-colonial regime in the oPt (Abourahme, 2016; Meneley, 2021, this issue; Rabie, 2020; Salamanca, 2016; Stamatopoulou-Robbins, 2021, this issue; Tabar, 2016; Tartir, 2015).…”

Section: For “A No-state Yet To Come”mentioning

confidence: 99%

For “a no-state yet to come”: Palestinian urban place-making in Kufr Aqab, Jerusalem

Hatoum

2020

Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores Palestinians’ place-making in Jerusalem under the constant threat of displacement and dispossession. I center my focus on Kufr Aqab, a neighborhood that was cut off from Jerusalem by the construction of Wall in 2003 while remaining inside the borders of the city’s municipality. After 1967 Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the borders of Jerusalem’s municipality expanded and Kufr Aqab village was annexed as a neighborhood inside Jerusalem’s newly formed borders. Since its occupation, a matrix of displacement and dispossession consisting of policies and practices was put in place to oversee the domination of the Palestinians in the city. In my research, I explore the possibilities of reconceptualizing Palestinian urban spaces and place-making in Kufr Aqab between the gap in settler-colonial governance and the Palestinian future of no-state. I show how the urban space emulates a camp-like space that I describe as an “affective infrastructure” of a camp. Being on the Israeli settler-colonial frontier, I argue that Kufr Aqab dwellers are kept suspended in time in a liminal zone between the ghost of displaceability from the Israeli state and in a deep suspension of no-state. I conclude by suggesting that the case of Kufr Aqab speaks to the space-making, displacement, and statelessness of the present as well as futurity of the West Bank (and East Jerusalem), where the future of the Palestinian state is far from being seen in the horizon and debilitated sovereignty is exercised on a limited scale in fragmented territories of governance.

show abstract

“…Salir del impase en el que se encuentran las negociaciones de Oslo requiere un compromiso con el proceso de descolonización de Palestina, nuevos marcos y nuevos presupuestos para entender por qué el conflicto persiste. Solo por medio del fin de la ocupación y la eliminación de las estructuras de opresión que crean el apartheid y el colonialismo israelí existentes sobre el terreno, podremos discutir sobre una solución futura a largo plazo (Tartir, 2015).…”

Section: Repensar Palestina Hacia Una Agenda De Investigación Descolunclassified

Repensando Palestina. Una crítica a la paz liberal de Oslo desde un marco analítico del colonialismo

Arias

2018

REIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen En este estudio hacemos un análisis crítico del proceso de paz de Oslo iniciado entre palestinos e israelíes en 1993, poniendo de manifiesto cómo estos acuerdos son elementos constitutivos a través de los cuales se manifiestan dos formas de colonialismo que operan y se configuran sobre la tierra de Palestina. Una basada en la lógica de apropiación/violencia, ejercida por Israel; y otra de modernización/desarrollo, ejercida por los donantes internacionales a través de su definición del proceso de paz desde el paradigma de la paz liberal. Se hablará de la narrativa de paz de Oslo, entendido como un marco estructural e ideológico que actúa como una matriz de control que se complementa con estas dos formas de colonialismo llegando a legitimarlas.

show abstract

Securitised development and Palestinian authoritarianism under Fayyadism

Cited by 38 publications

References 16 publications

The Evolution and Reform of Palestinian Security Forces 1993–2013

The Evolution and Reform of Palestinian Security Forces 1993–2013

For “a no-state yet to come”: Palestinian urban place-making in Kufr Aqab, Jerusalem

Repensando Palestina. Una crítica a la paz liberal de Oslo desde un marco analítico del colonialismo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About