“…On the other hand, the specific SS yields obtained for both study years at FG1 (i.e., 4 and 18 t/km 2 /year, respectively for each year) and at FG2 (i.e., 0.7 and 1.9 t/km 2 /year) are similar to those obtained for other Mediterranean domains of similar characteristics in size, climate (i.e., mainly rainfall‐based flow regimes with a marked seasonality and usual torrentiality, hence hydraulically limited), and geology (i.e., sediment supply‐limited fluvial system). Such examples would be the Siurana River (in the unregulated section), which produced 11 t/km 2 /year (Lobera, Batalla, Vericat, López‐Tarazón, & Tena, ) or the Bosc and Campás gauging stations (Vernegá experimental catchment), delivering 0.1 and 0.7 t/km 2 /year respectively for the period 1993–1997 (Sala & Farguell, ) and 4.34 and 7.89 t/km 2 /year respectively for the period 2005–2009 (Pacheco, Farguell, Úbeda, Outeiro, & Miguel, ). However, these values can be considered as low or very low if they are compared either with similar‐sized unregulated Mediterranean catchments in the Iberian Peninsula (e.g., the Ribera Salada catchment, delivering 12 t/km 2 /year (Vericat & Batalla, ); the Tordera catchment, generating 78 t/km 2 /year (Batalla, Garcia, & Rovira, ); the Isábena catchment, producing 527 t/km 2 /year (López‐Tarazón, Batalla, Vericat, & Francke, ) or put in a wider context such as the classification made by Vanmaercke, Poesen, Verstraeten, de Vente, and Ocakoglu () for Europe's river catchments, in which both FG1 and FG2 would be classified at the bottom of the group of low sediment yield values (i.e., < 40 t/km 2 /year), demonstrating the low sediment availability of both catchments.…”