2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment transport in two mediterranean regulated rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the specific SS yields obtained for both study years at FG1 (i.e., 4 and 18 t/km 2 /year, respectively for each year) and at FG2 (i.e., 0.7 and 1.9 t/km 2 /year) are similar to those obtained for other Mediterranean domains of similar characteristics in size, climate (i.e., mainly rainfall‐based flow regimes with a marked seasonality and usual torrentiality, hence hydraulically limited), and geology (i.e., sediment supply‐limited fluvial system). Such examples would be the Siurana River (in the unregulated section), which produced 11 t/km 2 /year (Lobera, Batalla, Vericat, López‐Tarazón, & Tena, ) or the Bosc and Campás gauging stations (Vernegá experimental catchment), delivering 0.1 and 0.7 t/km 2 /year respectively for the period 1993–1997 (Sala & Farguell, ) and 4.34 and 7.89 t/km 2 /year respectively for the period 2005–2009 (Pacheco, Farguell, Úbeda, Outeiro, & Miguel, ). However, these values can be considered as low or very low if they are compared either with similar‐sized unregulated Mediterranean catchments in the Iberian Peninsula (e.g., the Ribera Salada catchment, delivering 12 t/km 2 /year (Vericat & Batalla, ); the Tordera catchment, generating 78 t/km 2 /year (Batalla, Garcia, & Rovira, ); the Isábena catchment, producing 527 t/km 2 /year (López‐Tarazón, Batalla, Vericat, & Francke, ) or put in a wider context such as the classification made by Vanmaercke, Poesen, Verstraeten, de Vente, and Ocakoglu () for Europe's river catchments, in which both FG1 and FG2 would be classified at the bottom of the group of low sediment yield values (i.e., < 40 t/km 2 /year), demonstrating the low sediment availability of both catchments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the specific SS yields obtained for both study years at FG1 (i.e., 4 and 18 t/km 2 /year, respectively for each year) and at FG2 (i.e., 0.7 and 1.9 t/km 2 /year) are similar to those obtained for other Mediterranean domains of similar characteristics in size, climate (i.e., mainly rainfall‐based flow regimes with a marked seasonality and usual torrentiality, hence hydraulically limited), and geology (i.e., sediment supply‐limited fluvial system). Such examples would be the Siurana River (in the unregulated section), which produced 11 t/km 2 /year (Lobera, Batalla, Vericat, López‐Tarazón, & Tena, ) or the Bosc and Campás gauging stations (Vernegá experimental catchment), delivering 0.1 and 0.7 t/km 2 /year respectively for the period 1993–1997 (Sala & Farguell, ) and 4.34 and 7.89 t/km 2 /year respectively for the period 2005–2009 (Pacheco, Farguell, Úbeda, Outeiro, & Miguel, ). However, these values can be considered as low or very low if they are compared either with similar‐sized unregulated Mediterranean catchments in the Iberian Peninsula (e.g., the Ribera Salada catchment, delivering 12 t/km 2 /year (Vericat & Batalla, ); the Tordera catchment, generating 78 t/km 2 /year (Batalla, Garcia, & Rovira, ); the Isábena catchment, producing 527 t/km 2 /year (López‐Tarazón, Batalla, Vericat, & Francke, ) or put in a wider context such as the classification made by Vanmaercke, Poesen, Verstraeten, de Vente, and Ocakoglu () for Europe's river catchments, in which both FG1 and FG2 would be classified at the bottom of the group of low sediment yield values (i.e., < 40 t/km 2 /year), demonstrating the low sediment availability of both catchments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La concentración media de sedimentos en suspensión para el periodo 2013-2015 es 0,09 g/l, alcanzando un máximo instantáneo de 17 g/l asociado a un caudal de 48 m 3 /s durante la crecida del 31/07/2015. Se trata de una concentración similar a las obtenidas por Lobera et al (2016a;2016b) …”
Section: El Tramo Alto Del Cincaunclassified
“…Si se comparan la C ss máxima obtenidas durante las actuaciones en el cauce con las obtenidas en eventos de crecida en el cercano río Ésera, la C SS máxima es mucho menor (i.e. C SS máxima en verano 27,8 g/l, Lobera et al, 2016b). Es interesante señalar también que las altas concentraciones alcanzadas durante los días de actuación en el cauce alteraron por ejemplo la deriva de macroinvertebrados en el tramo de estudio (para más detalles consultar Béjar et al, 2017).…”
Section: P a P E R A C C E P T E D P R E -P R I N T V E R S I O Nunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, more reclamation is needed in areas affected by intense erosion processes to limit erosion effects in lowland areas (Gallart et al, ). This is particularly the case for badland areas, which are commonly the main sediment sources and runoff generating areas (Regüés et al, ; Nadal‐Romero & Regüés, ; Nadal‐Romero et al, , ; Cappadonia et al, ; Lobera et al, ).…”
Section: New Questions For An Old Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%