2015
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.2015.1025338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed morphology and genome size in two TuscanCrocus(Iridaceae) endemics:C. etruscusandC. ilvensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seed surface types assist in the utilized characteristics in systematics of the genus (Davis, 1984). These results are also compatible with studies conducted with various genera such as Crocus (Grilli Caiola et al, 2010;Harpke et al, 2014;Carta et al, 2015;Kerndorff et al, 2015 and2016), Romulea (Karaismailoğlu, 2015), Gladiolus (Zhygalova et al, 2015) within the family.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The seed surface types assist in the utilized characteristics in systematics of the genus (Davis, 1984). These results are also compatible with studies conducted with various genera such as Crocus (Grilli Caiola et al, 2010;Harpke et al, 2014;Carta et al, 2015;Kerndorff et al, 2015 and2016), Romulea (Karaismailoğlu, 2015), Gladiolus (Zhygalova et al, 2015) within the family.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, the hair features of C. pallasii were highly variable between the populations, and these variations showed that this taxon will be split in light of its other morphological and genetic characteristics (Erol et al, 2014(Erol et al, , 2015. We trust that the seed coat patterns may be a good marker at the species level when considered together with the other characteristics, and Carta et al (2015) were in agreement with our opinion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Turkey is the richest country with 137 Crocus taxa (Harpke et al, 2012;Ruksans, 2017). Different conventional morphological features used in Crocus taxonomy with regards to possibly distinguishing monophyletic groups within the genus have been reported in the literature (Harpke et al, 2012(Harpke et al, , 2014Carta et al, 2015), in which it was found that none of the traditional morphological features were suitable for discriminating Crocus sections or series. This status has caused some problems in their classification; therefore, additional characteristics that can assist the existing diagnostics are needed for the classification of Crocus taxa.Crocus seed color, structure, and surface sculpture are of much importance in terms of taxonomical applications (Maw, 1886).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, the biology and phylogenetic relationships have been investigated in only a few taxa, among which Petagnaea gussonei (Gianguzzi 2002;Gianguzzi and La Mantia 2004;De Castro et al 2009, Sardinian Aquilegia (Garrido et al 2012;Mattana et al 2012), Gymnospermium scipetarum subsp. eddae (Rosati et al 2019a(Rosati et al , 2019bMarzario et al 2022), and Crocus etruscus (Carta et al 2014(Carta et al , 2015(Carta et al , 2016Harpke et al 2015). Based on available karyological data, the mean chromosome number is 32.1 (± 22.5), similarly to the whole Italian endemic flora (30.7 according to Bedini et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%