2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic attenuation beneath Europe and the North Atlantic: Implications for water in the mantle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high‐density anomaly is right above the upper mantle low‐ V s zone (−4.6% with respect to PREM), which also follows the TESZ from the Black Sea to southern Sweden (Zuilhuis & Nolet, ). The V s anomaly, although not imaged in more recent regional tomographic models (Lebedev et al, ; Legendre et al, ; Zhu et al, ) was explained as the image of a highly hydrated subducting slab associated with closure of the Tornquist Ocean and collisional tectonics along the edge of the East European craton (Nolet & Zuilhuis, ). If this interpretation is correct, the high‐density body imaged in our model may be the shallow part of the oceanic slab, which is not resolved in seismic tomography due to the counter play of composition and low temperature, on one side, and high water content, on the other side.…”
Section: Density Of Subcontinental Lithosphere Mantle (Sclm)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high‐density anomaly is right above the upper mantle low‐ V s zone (−4.6% with respect to PREM), which also follows the TESZ from the Black Sea to southern Sweden (Zuilhuis & Nolet, ). The V s anomaly, although not imaged in more recent regional tomographic models (Lebedev et al, ; Legendre et al, ; Zhu et al, ) was explained as the image of a highly hydrated subducting slab associated with closure of the Tornquist Ocean and collisional tectonics along the edge of the East European craton (Nolet & Zuilhuis, ). If this interpretation is correct, the high‐density body imaged in our model may be the shallow part of the oceanic slab, which is not resolved in seismic tomography due to the counter play of composition and low temperature, on one side, and high water content, on the other side.…”
Section: Density Of Subcontinental Lithosphere Mantle (Sclm)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, a comparison of different continental regions calculated by different groups is challenging, in part due to fundamentally different assumptions on thermal structure of the upper mantle and on the depth range to which mantle gravity anomalies are confined. In particular, one may use thermal models constrained by surface heat flux and xenolith geothermobarometry and resolved on a 1° × 1° spatial grid (Artemieva et al, ; Artemieva & Mooney, ) or may constrain mantle temperatures from seismic tomography (Goes et al, , ; Kaban et al, ), despite that geophysical studies indicate the presence of a strong nonthermal (compositional, melt, water, and grain size) component in seismic velocity variations (Afonso & Schutt, ; Artemieva, ; Faul & Jackson, ; Godey et al, ; Lee, ; Zhu et al, ), and lateral resolution of these models is significantly less than 1° × 1° (Foulger et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer remains controversial because only one natural sample of hydrous ringwoodite with ~1 wt % of water has been discovered [ Pearson et al , ]. Although a few geophysical observations suggest the MTZ next to subducted slabs is hydrated by the slab dehydration [e.g., Zhu et al , ], others claim that no water is brought below 400 km depth by subduction [e.g., Green et al , ]. A related debate concerns global MTZ water content, as geophysical evidence for high water content (on the order of 0.1 wt %) has been found in the Pacific MTZ [ Huang et al , ], although Houser [] suggests a dry MTZ globally with only a few hydrous regions with ~0.6 wt % of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though general agreement exists on the transport of water via subduction to shallow mantle depths of < 250 km, the abundance of hydrous phases in deep subducted slabs still remains a disputed issue [ Abers , ; Hacker et al ., ; Hirschmann , ]. Indirect evidences for the transport of water via subduction into deeper mantle regions are provided by seismic anomalies in the vicinity of deep slabs, including seismic velocity attenuations [ Lawrence and Wysession , ; Zhu et al ., ], reduced seismic bulk velocities [ Chen and Brudzinski , ], seismic shear wave anisotropies [ Chen and Brudzinski , ; Di Leo et al ., ], deviations from the globally observed depth and thicknesses of the major mantle seismic discontinuities [ Deuss et al ., ], and from observed elevated electrical conductivities [ Guo and Yoshino , ; Ichiki et al ., ]. Additional evidence for the continuous transport of hydrous phases into deep mantle regions are provided by the presence of low‐velocity layers recently detected above subducted slabs in Tonga and Japan [ Savage , ; Tonegawa et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%