2023
DOI: 10.3390/math11122692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Bearing Capacity Solution for Strip Footings in Unsaturated Soils with Modified Pseudo-Dynamic Approach

Abstract: In engineering mathematics, the unsaturated nature of soil has a significant impact on the seismic bearing capacity solution. However, it has generally been neglected in the published literature to date. Based on the kinematic approach of limit analysis, the present study proposes a method for calculating the bearing capacity of shallow strip footings located in unsaturated soils, taking four common types of soils as examples. The modified pseudo-dynamic (MPD) approach is used to calculate the seismic forces v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismicity could dramatically enhance induced force for slope instability and decrease the shearing intensity for rock mass, which is an essential factor leading to the failure of rocky slopes [38,39]. Within the classical pseudo-static model, the seismic effect is normally simplified to a uniform inertial force, and this approximate treatment ignores the dynamic characteristics of seismicity [40,41]. In the conventional pseudo-dynamic approach, the seismic behavior is typically denoted in the form of a seismic wave motion [42].…”
Section: Modified Pseudo-dynamic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismicity could dramatically enhance induced force for slope instability and decrease the shearing intensity for rock mass, which is an essential factor leading to the failure of rocky slopes [38,39]. Within the classical pseudo-static model, the seismic effect is normally simplified to a uniform inertial force, and this approximate treatment ignores the dynamic characteristics of seismicity [40,41]. In the conventional pseudo-dynamic approach, the seismic behavior is typically denoted in the form of a seismic wave motion [42].…”
Section: Modified Pseudo-dynamic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%