2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic microzonation studies for the city of Ragusa (Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sophisticated and appropriated structure design/retrofitting approaches the design spectra and/or the ground motion acceleration time-histories are derived by previous freefield (FF) site response analyses. The latter approach definitely represents an important step forward [Capilleri et al, 2003[Capilleri et al, , 2005Ferraro et al, 2016Ferraro et al, , 2018Grasso and Maugeri, 2014;Castelli et al, 2018a,b], taking into account the specific conditions of subsoil and its fundamental filtering effects in terms of PHA and predominant frequency. Nevertheless, dynamic response at the foundation level of a structure deviates from the FF site response, because of kinematic and inertial interaction [Gazetas, 1991;Massimino et al, 2015;Abate et al, 2017a, b;Karatzetzou et al, 2017] and in different cases dynamic soil-structure interaction (DSSI) could be detri-mental for the structures [Mylonakis et al, 2000;Pandey et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sophisticated and appropriated structure design/retrofitting approaches the design spectra and/or the ground motion acceleration time-histories are derived by previous freefield (FF) site response analyses. The latter approach definitely represents an important step forward [Capilleri et al, 2003[Capilleri et al, , 2005Ferraro et al, 2016Ferraro et al, , 2018Grasso and Maugeri, 2014;Castelli et al, 2018a,b], taking into account the specific conditions of subsoil and its fundamental filtering effects in terms of PHA and predominant frequency. Nevertheless, dynamic response at the foundation level of a structure deviates from the FF site response, because of kinematic and inertial interaction [Gazetas, 1991;Massimino et al, 2015;Abate et al, 2017a, b;Karatzetzou et al, 2017] and in different cases dynamic soil-structure interaction (DSSI) could be detri-mental for the structures [Mylonakis et al, 2000;Pandey et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of a nonlinear analysis requires the determination of many parameters; it is therefore justified only in the presence of strong seismic inputs that lead to serious nonlinear phenomena in the soil. Results of these studies could be very useful to seismic microzonation [48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This earthquake was preceded by a damaging foreshock on January 9. It had an estimated magnitude of 7.4 on the moment magnitude scale and a maximum intensity of XI on the MCS, destroying at least 70 towns and cities, seriously affecting an area of 5,600 square kilometers and causing the death of about 60,000 people [Grasso and Maugeri, 2009a, 2009b, 2014Castelli et al, 2016a. The earthquake was followed by tsunamis that devastated the coastal villages on the Ionian Sea and in the Straits of Messina.…”
Section: The Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%