Seismic performance comparison between reinforced concrete frame structures with and without energy dissipating cladding panel system: Shaking table test and numerical simulation

Xie, Lili; Sha, Huiling; Xiao, Chong; Jia, Junbo

doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105414

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The shaking table test has been considered one of the most effective approaches to study seismic performance of the overall structures 1–3 . Due to the restrictions of the dimension and bearing capacity of the shaking table, scale models are often used 4,5 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scaling method for small sized model testing of steel‐reinforced concrete structures

Yang,

Lu,

Ren

et al. 2023

Earthquake Engineering and Resilience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The shaking table testing method on small sized models is one of the most effective approaches to study the overall seismic performance of various structures. Effective design of the scale model based on a rational scaling method can ensure the reliability of the test results. In this paper, the scaling methods are summarized into three levels: material similarity, component similarity, and structure similarity. A scaling method for steel‐reinforced concrete composite structures is proposed based on the component similarity, and experiments are conducted to verify the proposed method. The results show the flexural bearing capacity error between the model columns and prototype columns is within 20%, and both their force‐displacement curves and failure modes are consistent, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the scaling method. A 1/25 scale model of a steel‐reinforced concrete composite structure is designed based on the proposed method and tested on a shaking table to evaluate the seismic performance of its prototype. This research aims to provide a reference for the scaling method for shaking table tests.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%