2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-022-01590-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic reflection imaging of deep crustal structures via reverse time migration using offshore wide-angle seismic data on the eastern margin of the Sea of Japan

Abstract: We applied reverse time migration (RTM) to offshore wide-angle seismic data acquired with airgun shots and sparsely deployed ocean bottom seismographs (OBSs) for reflection imaging of the Moho discontinuity in the eastern margin of the Sea of Japan. While seismic tomography is generally applied to wide-angle seismic data for estimating regional velocity, reflection imaging is uncommon due to the low folds from wide-spacing OBS deployment. The long offset reflection data obtained by airgun-OBS surveys are promi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total crustal thickness is approximately 15–16 km (Nishisaka et al, 2001; Nishizawa & Asada, 1999) and resembles that of Domain I (Sato et al, 2014). Around Domain I, Shiraishi et al (2022) pointed out that the depth of Moho discontinuity obtained by seismic reflection imaging technique with reverse time migration using wide‐angle seismic data corresponds to that estimated by seismic refraction tomography and a diffraction stack migration using OBS data of Sato et al (2014). Moreover, the P‐wave velocity in the lowermost part of the crust in the northernmost basin off Akita is relatively high at approximately 7.1–7.2 km/s (Nishisaka et al, 2001; Nishizawa & Asada, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The total crustal thickness is approximately 15–16 km (Nishisaka et al, 2001; Nishizawa & Asada, 1999) and resembles that of Domain I (Sato et al, 2014). Around Domain I, Shiraishi et al (2022) pointed out that the depth of Moho discontinuity obtained by seismic reflection imaging technique with reverse time migration using wide‐angle seismic data corresponds to that estimated by seismic refraction tomography and a diffraction stack migration using OBS data of Sato et al (2014). Moreover, the P‐wave velocity in the lowermost part of the crust in the northernmost basin off Akita is relatively high at approximately 7.1–7.2 km/s (Nishisaka et al, 2001; Nishizawa & Asada, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the case of pre-stack experiments, the shot profile reverse-time migration consists of a non-reflective two-way wave equation modeled with a finite difference (FD) method of the scalar acoustic wave equation. The method implemented is described in steps Nolet, 1986;Shiraishi et al, 2022). By adopting the source-receiver reciprocity on the relation between airgun shots and OBS's for each spacial coordinate in the model (x in equations ( 1), ( 2) and ( 3)), the downgoing wavefields -Fi(x,t), equation (1) -are extrapolated forward in time from OBS locations (XOBSi (i=1,2,…,M), equation ( 1)).The upgoing wavefields -Bi(t,x), equation( 2) -are extrapolated backwards in time from airgun shot locations (Xshotj, equation ( 2)) (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting the source-receiver reciprocity on the relation between airgun shots and OBS's for each spacial coordinate in the model (x in equations ( 1), ( 2) and ( 3)), the downgoing wavefields -Fi(x,t), equation (1) -are extrapolated forward in time from OBS locations (XOBSi (i=1,2,…,M), equation ( 1)).The upgoing wavefields -Bi(t,x), equation( 2) -are extrapolated backwards in time from airgun shot locations (Xshotj, equation ( 2)) (e.g. (Schnurle et al, 2006;Shiraishi et al, 2022)):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm correctly images steep dips (even when angles exceed 90 °) and complex stratigraphic structures [3,[9][10][11][12]. RTM generally works well not only for seismic imaging of steeply dipping faults but also at crustal scales [13][14][15][16]. Since RTM employs an adjoint operator instead of a Hessian matrix, it has an intrinsic amplitude fidelity but suffers from resolution problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%