2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic response of irregular underground structures under adverse soil conditions using shaking table tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have focused on the analysis of structural internal force (Chen and Liu, 2018, Lei and Yong, 2020, Miao et al, 2020, Wang et al, 2021, Xu et al, 2020). Tang et al, (2020) conducted a shaking table test and found that the components of the bottom layer of a deep underground subway station construction, particularly the middle column, experienced cumulative damage, and other studies reported similar results (Chen et al, 2020, 2021, Miao et al, 2020). Seismic damage to underground structures in soft soil sites may be greater than that in liquefied sand sites (Chen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Other studies have focused on the analysis of structural internal force (Chen and Liu, 2018, Lei and Yong, 2020, Miao et al, 2020, Wang et al, 2021, Xu et al, 2020). Tang et al, (2020) conducted a shaking table test and found that the components of the bottom layer of a deep underground subway station construction, particularly the middle column, experienced cumulative damage, and other studies reported similar results (Chen et al, 2020, 2021, Miao et al, 2020). Seismic damage to underground structures in soft soil sites may be greater than that in liquefied sand sites (Chen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The geometric similarity ratio is set as 1:40 based on the maximum load of the shaking table and the size of the soil container. According to the Buckingham theory [31,32] and scaling laws [33], length l, elastic modulus E, and equivalent density ρ were chosen as the basic physical quantities. The similarity ratio of elastic modulus S E is obtained by comparing the elastic modulus of the model building material and the prototype building material.…”
Section: Similitude Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the characteristics of soil, excitation conditions of ground motions, contact conditions between underground structures and soil, and location of underground structures mainly based on numerical simulation and shaking table test, many scholars have made important contributions to this research [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Chen et al [19] studied the failure mechanism of a frame subway station structure in the loess area through a series of large-scale shaking table tests. e test results found that the soil-structure interaction was more significant in both horizontal and vertical directions when higher PGA was input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%