2010
DOI: 10.2478/s11600-010-0044-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic risk ranking for large dams in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original TRF method for earthquake risk analysis is expressed as [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] TRF = [(CRF + HRF + ARF) + DHF] × PDF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original TRF method for earthquake risk analysis is expressed as [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] TRF = [(CRF + HRF + ARF) + DHF] × PDF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was originally used for the dams in South Carolina (in United States) and its neighbor states. 12 Due to its simplicity, it is adopted by different researchers to provide a general (yet comprehensive) evaluation of dams in different countries such as Turkey, 13,14 India, 15 South Africa, 16 and Argentina. 17 Moreover Chen and Lin, 18 developed a method for total risk analysis of dams under the flood hazard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the value of M max is larger than the commonly used maximum credible 1718-2018 300 Fig. 3 Completeness periods for different magnitude ranges using Stepp method (Stepp 1972) earthquake for 10,000 years return period (Singh et al 2011). Due to the unavailability of strong-motion records, the study adopted five different attenuation relationships to calculate the expected peak ground acceleration (PGA) acting on the dam sites.…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%