2016
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2015.1113336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic vulnerability assessment form for free-standing columns based on a simplified numerical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, after the earlier 1 and the following analytical studies 2-6 (among others), referring to or based on the dynamics of rigid blocks, the research has been directed to experimental investigations [7][8][9][10] and, much more, to numerical studies, focused on the subject. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In several cases, the behavior of ancient columns was studied as part of wider approaches related, usually, with ongoing restoration projects of ancient monuments. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Analytical approaches published in the recent years should also be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, after the earlier 1 and the following analytical studies 2-6 (among others), referring to or based on the dynamics of rigid blocks, the research has been directed to experimental investigations [7][8][9][10] and, much more, to numerical studies, focused on the subject. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In several cases, the behavior of ancient columns was studied as part of wider approaches related, usually, with ongoing restoration projects of ancient monuments. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Analytical approaches published in the recent years should also be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work demonstrated that seismic records characterised by low frequency velocity pulses produce a similar rocking response despite of a significantly varying PGA. Many studies however, (Psycharis et al 2000;Papantonopoulos et al 2002;Psycharis et al 2003;Papaloizou and Komodromos 2009;Yagoda-Biran and Hatzor 2010;Dimitri et al 2011;Pappas et al 2016) focused on the seismic vulnerability of rocking bodies using only the PGA as IM, while in recent works (Psycharis et al 2013) a comparison between PGA and PGV was also attempted for assessing their reliability in expressing ground motion intensity. All studies mentioned above are effectively in agreement with the early proposal of Yim et al (1980) according to which, it is necessary to adopt a probabilistic approach to study rocking behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the seismic behavior of ancient Greek and Roman columns is of particular interest due to the significant seismic activity of the Eastern Mediterranean area [4]. Such studies were typically developed in technical literature according to three main approaches: (i) analytical [3,[5][6][7][8], (ii) numerical, with the use of a software [2,4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], or (iii) experimental [20,21]. The dynamic behavior of a multidrum free-standing column is controlled by rocking, sliding or a combination of the two mechanisms of the single drums or groups of them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seismic response is complex and highly non-linear [2,4]. Therefore, theoretical approaches initially involved analytical studies based on simplifying assumptions following the landmark study of G. W. Housner [5] and considered single and multiple block structures [3,[5][6][7][8]; then, recent studies were mainly developed with numerical methods [2,4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. These studies found that the seismic response of such elements is sensitive to the geometrical parameters of the columns, as well as to the material elastic properties, the coefficient of friction and the amplitude and frequency of the seismic action.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%