2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seizure frequency, quality of life, behavior, cognition, and sleep in pediatric patients enrolled in a prospective, open-label clinical study with cannabidiol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature is contradictory with respect to the effect of CBD on sleep in both human and animal studies, as some do not find an effect [22][23][24], some show significant improvements [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and some show detrimental effects [22,27,[32][33][34]. The data from this study suggest that these differences may be due to the underlying quality of sleep of individuals and the severity of DD.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The literature is contradictory with respect to the effect of CBD on sleep in both human and animal studies, as some do not find an effect [22][23][24], some show significant improvements [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and some show detrimental effects [22,27,[32][33][34]. The data from this study suggest that these differences may be due to the underlying quality of sleep of individuals and the severity of DD.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The results of some long-term open-label studies also show a growing trend with time. 18,48,49,55,58 This finding also differs from that of another study in which efficacy decreased rapidly over the first 6 months. 53 Seizure-free rates remained at approximately 4% across all periods.…”
Section: Periodcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…After the removal of 1350 duplicate records, the remaining 1930 publications were screened, and 61 studies were selected for full-text review (Figure 1). Following the evaluation of these studies for eligibility, 52 were excluded for the following reasons: 48 studies were not RCTs, 2 did not report AEs, and 2 were reanalyses of previously published articles . Finally, a total of 9 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%