2018
DOI: 10.1242/bio.030189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection against BALB/c strain cells in mouse chimaeras

Abstract: It has been shown previously that BALB/c strain embryos tend to contribute poorly to mouse aggregation chimaeras. In the present study we showed that BALB/c cells were not preferentially allocated to any extraembryonic lineages of mouse aggregation chimaeras, but their contribution decreased during the early postimplantation period and they were significantly depleted by E8.5. The development of BALB/c strain preimplantation embryos lagged behind embryos from some other strains and the contribution that BALB/c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from eight series of E12.5 aggregation chimaeras (XM, XN, XP, XR, PCT-V, PCT-VI, GMA and GMB) from four published studies (West and Flockhart, 1994; West et al, 1995b; Tang and West, 2001; MacKay et al, 2005) were analysed in the present study. The strain combinations are shown in ; other details are given in the original papers and are also summarised in Tang et al (2018). The chimaeras were produced by aggregating one Gpi1 a/a and one Gpi1 b/b embryo and the aggregates were transferred to Gpi1 c/c recipient females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from eight series of E12.5 aggregation chimaeras (XM, XN, XP, XR, PCT-V, PCT-VI, GMA and GMB) from four published studies (West and Flockhart, 1994; West et al, 1995b; Tang and West, 2001; MacKay et al, 2005) were analysed in the present study. The strain combinations are shown in ; other details are given in the original papers and are also summarised in Tang et al (2018). The chimaeras were produced by aggregating one Gpi1 a/a and one Gpi1 b/b embryo and the aggregates were transferred to Gpi1 c/c recipient females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%