2000
DOI: 10.4141/a99-135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection for cow lifetime pregnancy rate using bull and heifer growth and reproductive traits in composite cattle

Abstract: . 2000. Selection for cow lifetime pregnancy rate using bull and heifer growth and reproductive traits in composite cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 507-510. Genetic correlations of lifetime pregnancy rate with bull and heifer growth and reproductive traits in a beef composite population were estimated. Yearling scrotal circumference had an unfavorable genetic correlation (r g = -0.25) while yearling tonometer score was favorably related (r g = 0.22) to lifetime pregnancy rate. Heifer pregnancy rate, birth weigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1999; lifetime pregnancy rate –Toelle and Robison 1985; Morris and Cullen 1994; Morris et al. 1999; Mwansa et al. 2000; lifetime calf production –Morris and Cullen 1994; and an estimated breeding value (EBV) for fertility –Bamualim et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1999; lifetime pregnancy rate –Toelle and Robison 1985; Morris and Cullen 1994; Morris et al. 1999; Mwansa et al. 2000; lifetime calf production –Morris and Cullen 1994; and an estimated breeding value (EBV) for fertility –Bamualim et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 lists the male reproductive traits that have been reported to be associated with female fertility. Bovine pre-pubertal scrotal circumference and its association with pre-pubertal female progeny traits (age of puberty - Brinks et al 1978;King et al 1983;Vargas et al 1998;Martinez-Velazquez et al 2003; standardized age at first oestrus - Morris et al 1992Morris et al , 1993Morris et al , 1999; age at first calf - Smith et al 1989b;days to calving -Meyer et al 1991;Morris et al 1999;Meyer and Johnston 2001;yearling pregnancy rate -Morris and Cullen 1994;Eler et al 2004;heifer pregnancy rate -Evans et al 1999; lifetime pregnancy rate - Toelle and Robison 1985;Morris and Cullen 1994;Morris et al 1999;Mwansa et al 2000; lifetime calf production -Morris and Cullen 1994; and an estimated breeding value (EBV) for fertility - Bamualim et al 1984) make up the bulk of the data available in the literature, and it has been included for reference (Table 2). Other data for pre-pubertal male traits are sparse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the same study, the authors reported an unfavorable estimate of genetic correlation between SC and mean pregnancy rate (−0.12 ± 0.20) for cows mated at 3 yr of age or older. An unfavorable estimate of genetic correlation was also found between yearling SC and lifetime pregnancy rate (−0.25) in a composite beef herd (Mwansa et al, 2000). Near-zero estimates of additive genetic correlations were found between SC and CR1 and between SC and WR1 (Table 3).…”
Section: Estimates Of Genetic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, favorable genetic correlations for standardized age at first estrus with yearling pregnancy rate (−0.89 ± 0.17) and with pregnancy rate of 2-yr-old females (−0.29 ± 0.30) were published by Morris et al (2000). In another study, Mwansa et al (2000) reported a low estimate of genetic correlation between AP and lifetime pregnancy rate (−0.21) for a composite beef cattle population. Earlier, Laster et al (1979) reported correlations based on breed group means between AP and percentage pregnant (−0.42) and between AP and heifers calving at 2 yr of age during the first 25 d of the calving season (−0.75).…”
Section: Estimates Of Genetic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 97%