2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of communication technologies—A perspective based on information richness theory and trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the franchisees are highly trusted by the franchisor, 1120 N. Gorovaia and J. Windsperger the tolerance level of perceived risk will be higher for the franchisor, and the franchisor will more probably select knowledge-transfer mechanisms with a lower degree of information richness (Lo & Lie, 2008). Hence, under high trust, the franchisor is likely to use less HIR-and more LIR-knowledge-transfer mechanisms because in this low relational risk situation LIR-knowledge-transfer mechanisms facilitate sufficient knowledge-sharing.…”
Section: Relational Risk Reduction Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the franchisees are highly trusted by the franchisor, 1120 N. Gorovaia and J. Windsperger the tolerance level of perceived risk will be higher for the franchisor, and the franchisor will more probably select knowledge-transfer mechanisms with a lower degree of information richness (Lo & Lie, 2008). Hence, under high trust, the franchisor is likely to use less HIR-and more LIR-knowledge-transfer mechanisms because in this low relational risk situation LIR-knowledge-transfer mechanisms facilitate sufficient knowledge-sharing.…”
Section: Relational Risk Reduction Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents were then asked to state their appraisals of the stressful situation, negative emotions, choices of coping, and emotional change, sequentially. The survey presented three scenarios based on stressors listed by Hudiburg (1992Hudiburg ( , 1995Hudiburg ( , 2003b, the technology paradoxes shown by Mick and Fournier (1998), and the factors that affect consumer choices in communication technologies (Kelleher and O'Malley 2006;Lo and Lie 2008). The scenarios of the purchasing process included (a) obsolete products, i.e., the fear that the products a consumer decides to buy may be soon be outmoded; (b) constant renewal, i.e., the worry that new electronics will lead consumers to recognize previously unrealized needs and buy impulsively; and (c) technological complexity, i.e., consumers' fears that they do not have enough information about price, retailers, and product qualities, and uncertainty of whether or not they purchased a good product.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, highly uncertain messages are in greater need of rich information for lessening misunderstanding in order to ensure transmitting quality (Lo and Lie 2008;Palvia et al 2011). Given that negative information is generally presented with negative consequences and lack of beneficial results, it tends to arouse stronger feelings of outcome uncertainty (Broemer 2002;Fiske 1980;Kaneouse and Hanson 1971).…”
Section: Ewom Valence and Information Richnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As experience attribute is more ambiguous and abstract, consumers will need to reconstruct different pieces of information into an overall product evaluation (Coupey 1994;Johnson 1988;Johnson and Russo 1984). According to the information richness theory, highly ambiguous and uncertain attributes which create more latitude for judgment are important factors in accounting for superior performance of information richness (Daft and Lengel 1986;Lo and Lie 2008;Palvia et al 2011). Besides, information richness will be higher for personal-oriented subjective message than for functional-oriented objective message (Otondo et al 2008).…”
Section: Product Typementioning
confidence: 99%