2011
DOI: 10.1021/cb200146a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Inhibition of the Kir2 Family of Inward Rectifier Potassium Channels by a Small Molecule Probe: The Discovery, SAR, and Pharmacological Characterization of ML133

Abstract: The Kir inward rectifying potassium channels have a broad tissue distribution and are implicated in a variety of functional roles. At least seven classes (Kir1 – Kir7) of structurally related inward rectifier potassium channels are known, and there are no selective small molecule tools to study their function. In an effort to develop selective Kir2.1 inhibitors, we performed a high-throughput screen (HTS) of more than 300,000 small molecules within the MLPCN for modulators of Kir2.1 function. Here we report on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
86
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we observed an increase in the rate of inhibition by ML133 when the pH of the extracellular solution was raised to 8.5, as previously described for K IR 2.1 ( Fig. S2) (34). Thus, based on sensitivity to Ba 2+ , Cs + , and ML133, we conclude that the resting K + current in PKD2L1 cells is mediated by K IR 2.1.…”
Section: Sour Taste Cells Respond To Intracellular Acidification Withsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we observed an increase in the rate of inhibition by ML133 when the pH of the extracellular solution was raised to 8.5, as previously described for K IR 2.1 ( Fig. S2) (34). Thus, based on sensitivity to Ba 2+ , Cs + , and ML133, we conclude that the resting K + current in PKD2L1 cells is mediated by K IR 2.1.…”
Section: Sour Taste Cells Respond To Intracellular Acidification Withsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…3 C and D), but considerably different from the IC 50 of either K IR 2.2 or K IR 4.2 (0.23 ± 0.06 and 5.8 ± 0.8 μM, respectively; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple-comparison test). Finally, we tested the K IR 2-specific blocker ML133, which has a reported IC 50 of 1.9 μM for K IR 2.1 (34). ML133 (50 μM) blocked the resting K + current in PKD2L1 cells by ∼90%, similar to its effect on K IR 2.1 and K IR 2.2, whereas K IR 4.2 was virtually insensitive to ML133 ( Fig.…”
Section: Sour Taste Cells Respond To Intracellular Acidification Withmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…ML133 binds to residues on the inner face of the pore-lining M2 helix and presumably blocks the K ϩ permeation pathway at that level (54). In the same conditions we employed ([K ϩ ] o ϭ 140 mM, V m ϭ Ϫ100 mV, and pH 7.4), ML133 inhibits Kir2 channels with K 1/2 values in the range of ϳ2-4 M, while other Kir subfamilies (Kir1, Kir4, Kir6, and Kir7) exhibit K 1/2 values of ϳ8 M or higher (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Min Li and colleagues took a modern drug discovery approach to develop a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of Kir2.1 [28]. Using a fluorescence-based thallium (Tl + ) flux assay [29,30], the investigators screened approximately 300,000 structurally diverse small molecules from the NIH Molecular Libraries Small-Molecule Repository for chemical modulators of Kir2.1.…”
Section: Cardiac Kir2x Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%